INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHANDIGARH BENCH)
PARAS AND SHUBHAM CHAUDHARY LEGAL HEIR OF KANHAIYA LAL PANCHKULA – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 2 PANCHKULA – Respondent
आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण,चÖडीगढ़ Ûयायपीठ, चÖडीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1236/CHD/2016 (cid:467)नधा(cid:91)रण वष(cid:91) / Assessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Paras and Shubham Chaudhary The ITO, LH of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, House No.99, Vs Ward No. 2, Sector 4, Panchkula. Panchkula.
èथायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: CAHPP6878A अपीलाथ(cid:568)/Appellant (cid:292)×यथ(cid:568)/Respondent Assessee by : Shri Rishab Gupta & Shri Mukesh Aggarwal,CAs Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 10.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 24.09.2025 PHYSICAL HEARING O R D E R PER RAJ PAL YADAV, VP The present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 22.09.2016 passed for assessment year 2007-08.
2. The assessee has taken three grounds of appeal, out of which Ground No.2 and 3 are peripheral argument in support of the issue agitated under Ground No.1, hence, the solitary grievance of the assessee is whether interest amounting to Rs.1,64,03,9
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.