SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 20655

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHANDIGARH BENCH)
PARAS AND SHUBHAM CHAUDHARY LEGAL HEIR OF KANHAIYA LAL PANCHKULA – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 2 PANCHKULA – Respondent


आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण,चÖडीगढ़ Ûयायपीठ, चÖडीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1236/CHD/2016 (cid:467)नधा(cid:91)रण वष(cid:91) / Assessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Paras and Shubham Chaudhary The ITO, LH of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, House No.99, Vs Ward No. 2, Sector 4, Panchkula. Panchkula.

èथायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: CAHPP6878A अपीलाथ(cid:568)/Appellant (cid:292)×यथ(cid:568)/Respondent Assessee by : Shri Rishab Gupta & Shri Mukesh Aggarwal,CAs Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 10.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 24.09.2025 PHYSICAL HEARING O R D E R PER RAJ PAL YADAV, VP The present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 22.09.2016 passed for assessment year 2007-08.

2. The assessee has taken three grounds of appeal, out of which Ground No.2 and 3 are peripheral argument in support of the issue agitated under Ground No.1, hence, the solitary grievance of the assessee is whether interest amounting to Rs.1,64,03,9

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top