SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 21096

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
CHENTHANMARA KP NAIR MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 42(2)(1) MUMBAI MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4979/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year : 2018-19)

Chenthanmara KP Nair, G-103 Ekta Bhoomi Garden 1 & H Co-Op. HSG Soc. Ltd., Datta Pada Road, Borivali (East), Mumbai ............... Appellant Mumbai - 400066 v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax –

42(2)(1), C41-43, G Block BKC, Gilban Area, ……………… Respondent Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051 PAN : ACRPN1974B Assessee by : Shri Uday P. Shah Revenue by : Shri Vikas Chandra, Sr.DR Date of Hearing – 23/09/2025 Date of Order - 26/09/2025

O R D E R

PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M.

The Assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned order dated 10.07.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Additional / Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata, [“learned Additional / Joint CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2018-19.

2. In this appeal, the Assessee has raised the following grounds: –

“1 The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has committed an error in law and on facts by failing to direct the Assessing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top