SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 21345

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
VISHAL FURNISHING LIMITED MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 8(3)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, AM AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM ITA No. 4550/Mum/2024 (Assessment Year: 2018-19)

Vishal Furnishing Limited Assistant Commissioner of Income

211, Shiv Shakti Industrial Complex, Tax, Circle 8(3)(1), Mumbai.

Vs.

Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400011.

PAN/GIR No. AAACR2138K (Appellant) : (Respondent Assessee by : Shri Rahul Hakkani Respondent by : Shri Vivek Perampurna (CIT DR)

Date of Hearing : 10.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 01.10.2025

O R D E R

Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:

This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Delhi (‘ld. CIT(A)’ for short), National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’ for short) passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2018-19.

2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

1) The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the Assessment order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the scheme of assessment and hence the Assessment order was a nullity and deserves to be quashed.

2) The Ld CIT(A) erred in confir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top