INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
MUTHUSAMY NAGARAJ ERODE – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ERODE RANGE ERODE – Respondent
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ (cid:1)यायपीठ, चे(cid:9)ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI (cid:1)ी एबी टी. वक(cid:10), (cid:11)ाियक सद(cid:17) एव ं
(cid:1)ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद(cid:9) के सम(cid:27)
BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2878/Chny/2024 िनधा(cid:14)रण वष(cid:14)/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Muthusamy Nagaraj, v. The Addl.CIT, 51/1, Nehru Street, Erode Range, Ashokapuram, Erode.
Erode-638 003.
[PAN: ACWPN 5729 M (अपीलाथ(cid:22)/Appellant) ((cid:23)(cid:24)यथ(cid:22)/Respondent)
अपीलाथ(cid:22) क(cid:26) ओर स/े Appellant by : Mr.N.V.Narayanan, Advocate (cid:23)(cid:24)यथ(cid:22) क(cid:26) ओर स े /Respondent by : Ms.R. Kavitha, Addl.CIT सुनवाईक(cid:26)तारीख/Date of Hearing : 08.09.2025 घोषणाक(cid:26)तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 07.10.2025 आदशे / O R D E R PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 28.06.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2017-18 assailing the penalty confirmed by him which was levied by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.