SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 22073

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
Manu Kumar Giri, Judicial Member, S.R. Raghunatha, Accountant Member
Swaminathan Sukumar – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
ITA No.: 1105/CHNY/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G. Baskar
For the Respondents: Anitha

The levy of additional tax under Section 140B(3) should account for procedural delays in the availability of electronic filing utilities, and interest under Section 234A is compensatory in nature, ceasing strictly upon the payment of the full tax liability.

Headnote:(A) Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 139(8A) and Section 140B - Updated Return regime - Additional tax levy - Whether 25% or 50% rate is applicable - Procedural impossibility due to non-availability of e-filing utilities - Held that where the taxpayer was prevented from filing the updated return during the first 12 months from the end of the assessment year due to administrative delays (non-availability of forms), the 25% additional tax rate under Section 140B(3)(i) should be applied to avoid inequitable imposition of the 50% rate - Principles of administrative fairness and legitimate expectation emphasized. (Paras 10, 12)

(B) Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 234A - Interest - Compensatory nature - Interest is levied to compensate for the delay in payment of taxes - Once the entire tax liability and fees are discharged, interest under Section 234A should cease to accrue - The calculation of interest must be restricted to the date of actual payment of tax. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The assessee filed an updated return under Section 139(8A) for AY 2020-21 on 31.10.2022. The Revenue applied 50% additional tax under Section 140B(3)(ii) and calculated interest under Section 234A up to the date of filing the updated return, despite the tax having been paid on 25.05.2022. The assessee contended that the ITR-U utility was unavailable for the relevant category until July 2022, creating a procedural barrier.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the delay was due to procedural impossibility and that levying 50% additional tax was inequitable. Furthermore, the court affirmed that the compensatory nature of interest under Section 234A mandates its cessation upon the date of full tax payment.

Issues: Whether the 25% or 50% additional tax rate applies under Section 140B(3), and whether interest under Section 234A should be computed until the date of payment or filing.

Ratio Decidendi: Procedural lapses by the department in making online forms available should not prejudice the substantive rights of an assessee; interest under Section 234A is compensatory and cannot accrue after the tax liability is fully satisfied.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of updated return filing timelines and the dispute regarding additional tax rates and interest calculation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning procedural impossibility due to utility unavailability and the compensatory nature of section 234a interest. (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. determination that procedural delays shouldn't cause higher tax rates and interest must cease upon tax payment. (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

आदेश /O R D E R

PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Addl/JCIT(A), Agra [hereinafter the “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 29.03.2025 arising out of the intimation dated 27.12.2023 issued by the Deputy Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as the "AO") passed u/s.143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter "the Act') for the Assessment Year 2020-21 (hereinafter the"AY").

2. Chronical dates chart is as under:

# Date Event
1 31.07.2020 Original due date u/s 139(1) for AY 2020-21 (individual, non-audit case)
2 10.01.2021 Extended due date for filing ROI for AY 2020-21 (COVID-related extension)
3 31.03.2021 End of AY 2020-21
4 31.03.2022 Last date to file Updated Return with 25% additional tax under section 140B(3)(i)
5 01.04.2022 Section 139(8A) & 140B came into force via Finance Act, 2022 (start of Updated Return regime)
6 25.05.2022 Self-assessment tax of Rs.4,64,062 paid (includes tax, interest, fee after TDS credit)
7 27.06.2022 ITR-U enabled on portal for ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2020-21
8 09.07.2022 ITR-U enabled on portal for ITR-2 and ITR-3 for AY 2020-21
9 31.10.2022 Updated Return filed u/s 139(8A) for AY 2020-21
10 01.02.2023 CBDT issued FAQs via Press Release (e-Verification Scheme 2021) clarifying 25%/50% applicability
11 31.03.2023 Last date to file Updated Return with 50% additional tax under section 140B(3)(ii)

3. Brief facts of the case are as under: The assessee is an individual and has not filed his return of income within the due date as per sections 139(1) or 139(4) of the Act. The assessee paid self-assessment income tax of Rs.3,07,667/-, interest of Rs.1,46,395/- u/s.234A, 234B, 234C and fee of Rs.10,000/- u/s.234F of the Act, totaling to Rs.4,64,062/- on 25.05.2022 after deducting TDS of Rs.25,632/- from rental income. The assessee filed an updated return u/s.139(8A) of the Act on 31.10.2022 and claims that Form ITR 3 was not enabled for filing before that date. The assessee contends that the CPC has computed interest u/s.234A of the Act till 31.10.2022 (date of filing the updated return) instead of till 25.05.2022 (date of payment of tax) and has charged additional tax u/s.140B(3)(ii) of the Act at the rate of 50% instead of 25%, leading to the demand of Rs.3,15,733/-. Aggrieved with the intimation issued u/s.143(1) of the Act dated 27.12.2023, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal by holding as under:

5.2.1 The assessee has contended that the additional tax u/s 140B(3) should not have been charged at 50% as the forms for filing updated returns in ITR 3 were enabled only 31.10.2022, whereas forms for ITR 1 and 4 were enabled earlier on 12.07.2022. Additionally, the appellant argues that the additional tax should have been charged at 25% as this was the first year of implementation of the updated return scheme, making it impossible for the delay to exceed two years.

5.2.2 Section 140B (3) of the Act clearly prescribes two rates of additional tax: 25% if the updated return is filed before completion of twelve months from the end of the relevant assessment year, and 50% if filed thereafter but before twenty-four months, For AY 2020-21, the assessment year ended on 31.03,2021, The appellant filed the updated return 31.10.2022, which is beyond twelve months from 31.03.2021, making the 50% rate applicable as per Section 140B (3))

5.23 The practical difficulties regarding availability of forms, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top