INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAIPUR BENCH)
Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, J
Raman Vasu Thachisaril Ramanalayam Clappana – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-Jagdalpur – Respondent
आदेश/ORDER
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 14.10.2024 for the assessment year 2011-12 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
2. At the very outset, it is noted that there is delay of 396 days in filing appeal before the Tribunal. That explaining the reasons for such delay and praying for condonation of the same, the assessee had filed condonation petition a/w. affidavit, dated 02.02.2026 and medical certificates. The relevant contents of the said affidavit are extracted as follows:



3. I have carefully perused the contents of the affidavit and condonation petition as well as medical certificates and heard the submissions of the parties herein. In my considered view, there is no deliberate or malafide conduct on the part of the assessee, if any, for late filing of this appeal. Nothing has been placed on record by the Department suggesting that the delay caused by the assessee was deliberate. Considering the ratio laid down in the judicial pronouncements viz. (i) Collector, Land Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors, reported in 167 ITR 471 (SC); (ii) Vidya Shankar Jaiswal Vs. ITO, Ward-2






Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.