SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 23253

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JAIPUR BENCH)
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ALWAR – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK SHARMA REWARI – Respondent


vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqj U;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR MkW-a ,l-lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] y[s kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@

ITA. No. 1227/JPR/2024 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@

Assessment Years : 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner of cuke Ashok Sharma, Income Tax, Vs. Village Paragpura, Alwar. Rewari-123412, Haryana.

LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: CIAPS9799A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@

Assessee by : Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Advocate jktLo dh vksj ls Revenue by : Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR alquokbZ dh rkjh[k@

Date of Hearing 29/10/2025 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 10/11/2025 vkns'k@

ORDER PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM Feeling dissatisfied with finding so recorded in the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, dated 27.08.2024 the present appeal was filed by the revenue. The dispute relates to the assessment year 2018-19. Ld. CIT(A) passed that order because the assessee challenged the order of assessment of income passed upon him u/s 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) & 143(3B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top