SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 23848

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
VINOD BHATI BALLABGARH – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD - 2(5) FARIDABAD – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.14/Del/2021, A.Y. 2016-17 Vinod Bhati, Income Tax Officer, FCA-231, Mohana Road, Ward-2(5), Yadav Colony, Vs. Faridabad Ballabhgarh-121004 PAN: AVGPB7529Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant by Sh. Vibhor Garg, CA Respondent by Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 27/11/2025 Date of Pronouncement 03/12/2025 ORDER PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER;

1. This appeal by the assessee directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Faridabad dated 28.02.2020 for the assessment year (‘AY’) 2016-17. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:

“The assessee is engaged in the business of property dealing.

He purchased agricultural land in palwal in acres and did plotting and sold it to various customers.

For selling the plots he set up works office in various areas of Faridabad and palwal and paid rent accordingly.

Ground appeal No 1 Commission expenses = Rs 1,64,40,646/- added to the returned Income In order to sale his plots he had to pay commission @20% on sales to various persons. In property dealing business, it is customa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top