SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 24354

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HYDERABAD BENCH)
VENKATA RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU CHINTALAPATI HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
DCIT. CIRCLE 8(1) HYDERABAD – Respondent


आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad (cid:302)ी रवीश सूद, माननीय Ûया(cid:467)यक सदèय एवं (cid:302)ी मधुसूदन साव(cid:875)डया, माननीय लेखा सदèय SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER .अपी.सं /ITA No.143/Hyd/2025 ((cid:467)नधा(cid:91)रण वष(cid:91)/Assessment Year: 2018-19)

Venkata Rama Krishnam Raju Vs. DCIT, Chintalapati, Circle-8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad.

PAN: AFKPC3305H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Shri KA Sai Prasad, CA (cid:467)नधा(cid:91)(cid:464)रती (cid:622)वारा/Assessee by:

& CA P Yashodhan राजè व (cid:622)वारा/Revenue by:

Shri Waseem UR Rehman, Sr.AR

04/12/2025 सुनवाई क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख/Date of Hearing:

10/12/2025 घोषणा क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख/Date of Pronouncement: आदेश / ORDER PER. RAVISH SOOD, JM :

The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 07/11/2024, which in turn arises from the order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, “AO”) under Section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) dated 20.03.2024, for the Asses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top