INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
ELECTRONICS & QUALITY DEVELOPMENT CENTRE GANDHINAGAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DY.CIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1 AHMEDABAD – Respondent
ITA 248/AHD/2025[2022-23]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
BEFORE SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER &
SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER
I.T.A. No.248/Ahd/2025
(Assessment Year: 2022-23)
Electronics & Quality Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Development Centre, Income Tax (Exemption),
B-177/178 GIDC, Electronic Circle-1,
Centre, Sector-25, Gandhinagar, Vejalpur
Gujarat-382024
[PAN No.AAATE0718R]
(Appellant) .. (Respondent
Appellant by : Shri Sanjay R Shah, CA
Respondent by: Shri R. P. Rastogi, CIT-DR
Date of Hearing 13.10.2025
Date of Pronouncement 22.12.2025
O R D E R
PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by
the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”),
ADDL/JCIT(A)-3, Hyderabad vide order dated 26.11.2024 passed for A.Y.
2022-23.
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The Ld. Addl. CIT(A) - 3, Hyderabad has erred in law and on facts of the
case by partly allowing the appeal for statistical purpose only and thereby not
deleting the adjustments u/s.143(1)(a) of the I.T. Act, 1961, made by the Ld. Dy.
D1T, CPC, Bengaluru, by denying exemption and disallowing all the deductions
claimed u/s.11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 in the Revised Return of Income, though such
disallowances are beyond the scope of provisions of section 143(1)(a) of the I.T.
Act, 1961.
2. The Ld. Addl. C1T(A) - 3, Hyderabad has erred in law and on facts of the
case by partly allowing the appeal for statistical purpose, merely on the technical
ground that the Appellant has not filed Audit Report in Form-10B in time and
therefore, setting aside the matter to the file of the Ld. Assessing Officer, directing
to verify whether the Appellant has filed application for condonation of delay in
filing Audit Report in Form-10B.
##PAGE2##ITA No. 248/Ahd/2025
Electronics & Quality Development Centre vs. DCIT(E)
Asst.Year –2022-23
- 2–
3. The Ld. Addl. C1T(A) - 3, Hyderabad has also erred in law and on facts of
the case by partly allowing the appeal or statistical purpose only and not deciding
the appeal on merits even though the Appellant has duly e-filed Audit Report in
Form 10B along with the Revised Return of Income filed u/s.139(5) on 31.12.2022.
4. The Ld. Addl. CIT(A) - 3, Hyderabad has also erred in law and on facts of
the case by not taking into consideration that, Audit Report in Form 10B filed with
the Revised Return on 31.12.2022 was already available on records when
Intimation u/s.143(1) was issued on 04.04.2023 without taking cognizance of the
Audit Report in Form No.10B duly e-filed along with that Revised Return, as stated
above.
5. The Ld. Addl. CIT(A)-3, Hyderabad has also erred in law and on facts by
not properly appreciating that it is well settled that the requirement of filing Form-
10B in time is procedural and Form - 10B can be filed during assessment
proceedings or even during appellate stage and as such, issues involving delay in
filing Form-10B and condonation of delay are highly debatable issues and claim
for exemption cannot be denied on basis on such technical ground.
6. The Ld. Addl. CIT(A)-3, Hyderabad has also erred in law and on facts that
while not deciding the appeal on merits, it is also not appreciated that the Ld.
Assessing Officer has committed gross error by raising tax demand of
Rs.7,87,93,310/- which is 68.89% of assessed income of Rs.10,04,64,687/-.
7. The Ld. Addl. CIT(A) - 3, Hyderabad has erred in law and on facts of the
case by partly allowing the appeal for statistical purpose only and thereby not
deleting the adjustments u/s.143(1)(a) of the I.T. Act, 1961, made by the Ld. Dy.
DIT, CPC, Bengaluru, by disallowing all the deductions claimed u/s.11 of the I.T.
Act, 1961 in the Revised Return of Income, though such disallowances are beyond
the scope of provisions of section 143(l)(a) of the I.T. Act, 1961.
8. The Appellant therefore, prays for the following:
(i) that the income of the Appellant may kindly be directed to be assessed at
Rs.Nil as per the Revised R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.