2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 25205
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
ASB DESIGNS LLP NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL CIRCLE 26 DELHI – Respondent
ITA 6691/DEL/2025[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
ITA No. 6691/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year: 2018-19
ASB Designs LLP, Vs DCIT,
B-223, Naraina Industrial Area, Central Circle-26,
New Delhi-110028 New Delhi-110001
(APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT)
PAN No. ABDFA1476G
Assessee by: Sh. Sandeep Vijh, AR
Revenue by : Sh. Amit Shukla, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing: 23.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 23.12.2025
ORDER
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19
arises against the CIT(A)-29, New Delhi’s order dated
22.08.2025, in case No. CIT(A), Delhi-29/10559/2017-18, in
proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the
Act”).
2. Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
3. It emerges at the outset that there arises the first and
foremost issue of validity of section 148 proceedings herein
between the parties wherein the learned Assessing Officer had
issued his corresponding notice dated 21.03.2022 for
assessment year 2018-19 in question i.e. beyond the
prescribed period of three years from the end of the relevant
assessment year after getting approval of the PCIT, Delhi-10
##PAGE2##2 ITA No. 6691/Del/2025
ASB Designs LLP
only. This being the clinching factual position, the assessee has
quoted hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s decision that in such
an instance, the necessary sanction could not be obtained from
the PCIT as the facts herein, in light of Communist Party of
India (M) Vs. ITO, (2025) 174 taxmann.com 925 (Del.)
deciding the very issue against the department as follows:
“2. The petitioner is a national political party and is
registered under Section 29A of the Representation of
Peoples Act, 1951. The petitioner filed its return of income
for the assessment year [AY] 2016-17 on 15.10.2016,
declaring a NIL income, after claiming exemption under
Section 13A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. The initial notice under Section 148 of the Act for AY
2016-17 was issued on 28.06.2021. The said notice was
unsustainable as it was issued in accordance with the
statutory regime as existed prior to 31.03.2021. This court
in the case of Mon Mohan Kohli v. Assistant Commissioner
of Income Tax & Anr.: Neutral Citation No.:
2021:DHC:4181-DB had set aside such notices that were
issued after 31.03.2021 without following the procedure as
prescribed under Section 148A of the Act. Some of the
other High Courts also took a similar view and struck down
notices that were issued under Section 148 of the Act after
31.03.2021 but under the un-amended provisions relating
to the re-assessment of income that had escaped
assessment.
4. The Revenue appealed the decisions rendered by various
High Courts to the Supreme Court of India. In Union of
India v. Ashish Agarwal: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 543 - which
was one of such appeals arising from the decision of the
Allahabad High Court - the Supreme Court delivered its
decision on 04.05.2022, whereby it concurred with the view
that the amended provisions which came into force after
31.03.2021 would be applicable to notices issued
thereafter. However, the Supreme Court also issued
certain directions in exercise of powers under Article 142 of
the Constitution of India. The Court directed that all
notices that were issued under Section 148 of the Act after
01.04.2021 till the date of the said decision (04.05.2022),
including those that had been set aside by the High Courts,
would be construed as show cause notices under Section
148A(b) of the Act. The Assessing Officers were directed to
provide the information and material relied upon by the
Revenue for issuance of such notices, to the respective
assessees within a period of thirty days from the date of
##PAGE3##3 ITA No. 6691/Del/2025
ASB Designs LLP
the decision so as to enable the respective assessees to
respond to the same.
5. In compliance of the directions issued by the Supreme
Court in Union of India & Ors. v. Ashish Agarwal (supra),
the AO provided the information to the petitioner on
30.05.2022. The issue raised in the notice pertained to an
amount of Rs.1,