INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
INFINITE EXPEDITIONS PVT. LTD. MODINAGAR GHAZIABAD UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1)(1) GHAZIABAD GHAZIABAD – Respondent
ITA 6968/DEL/2025[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“SMC” BENCH, DELHI
BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 6968/DEL/2025 (AY: 2018-19)
(Physical hearing)
Infinite Expeditions Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1)(1),
B.K. Complex, S-3, Opp. Krishna Vs Ghaziabad.
Kunj Colony, Tibra Road, Modinagar, Income Tax Building, CGO
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-201204 Complex-1, Purani Hapur Chungi,
[PAN: AAECI0872M] Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-201002
Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue
Assessee by Shri Lakshay Gupta, CA
Revenue by Shri Virendra Kumar Singh, Sr. DR
Date of institution of appeal 31.10.2025
Date of hearing 01.12.2025
Date of pronouncement 23.12.2025
Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act
PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER;
1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A) dated
14.10.2025 for A.Y. 2018-19. The assessee has raised following grounds of
appeal:
(1) That impugned assessment proceeding-initiated u/s 147 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as the act) vide statutory notice dated
30.03.2022 issued u/s 148 of the act is non-est and void being said notice
has been issued in gross contravention of e-Assessment of Income
Escaping Assessment 1 Scheme, 2022 notified by Honourable CBDT u/s
151A of the act on 29.03.2022 vide CBDT Notification No. 18/2022 as the
authority prescribed and empowered to issue such statutory notice u/s 148
of the act lies with Faceless Assessing Officer and not with the
Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. As such, impugned assessment proceeding
deserves to be quashed at the threshold.
##PAGE2##ITA No. 6868/ Delhi /2025
Infinite Expeditions Pvt Ltd. (AY 2018-19)
(2) That the Ld. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1)(1), Ghaziabad (hereinafter
referred as Ld. JAO) had erred in law and facts of the matter by initiating
proceeding u/s 148A of the act merely on the basis of certain information
flagged on insight portal to conduct further investigation to verify the
authenticity and veracity of said information without even confronting the
material available on record. Thereby, Ld. JAO had contravened the
principle of natural justice and consequently, said enquiry proceeding and
subsequent assessment proceeding deserves to be quashed.
(3) That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and facts of the matter while
sustaining the Assessment Order without appreciating that the additions
have been made without providing adequate opportunity of being heard to
the Appellant. As such, the Assessment Order passed in violation of the
principle of natural justice is illegal and may please be quashed.
(4) That the Ld. CIT(A) had erred in law and facts of the matter by confirming
the additions of Rs. 21,39,398/- made u/s 68 of the act on account of
alleged unexplained cash credit found in the bank statements of appellant
without appreciating the fact that said credits were duly recorded in books
of accounts of the appellant and were appropriately reported in Audited
Financial Statements prepared for the period under consideration. As such,
the addition of Rs. 21,39,398/- is bad in law and may please be deleted.
(5) That the Ld. CIT(A) had erred in law and facts of the matter by confirming
the additions of Rs. 21,39,398/- made u/s 68 of the act on account of
alleged unexplained cash credit found in the bank statements of appellant
merely under the apprehension that the appellant company was not found
at the registered address during the course of inspection conducted by the
office of Investigation Wing of the Income Tax Department without
appreciating the fact that the appellant had shifted its business premises
from address, WHARE inspection was conducted and details of subsequent
address were duly reported in ITRs filed for AY's subsequent to such
shifting. Thereby, additions of Rs. 21,39,398/- made solely on the basis of
2
##PAGE3##ITA No. 6868/ Delhi /2025
Infinite Expeditions Pvt Ltd. (AY 2018-19)
inappropriate apprehension drawn by another statutory authority without
proper application of mind deserves to be deleted.
2. Brief facts of the c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.