INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SHANTILAL NAROTTAMDAS PANCHAL MALAD EAST – Appellant
Versus
ITO-41(3)(4) MUMBAI BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K (SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.3570/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year:2017-2018) Shantilal Narottamdas Panchal B-16, Rajhans Coop. HSG Society Ltd.
Jitendra Road, Malad East, Mumbai - 400097 . Maharashtra [PAN: AATPP9539N] …………. Appellant Vs Income Tax Officer 41(3)(4), Mumbai Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400051. Maharashtra. …………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Assessee : Shri Ravindra Poojary For the Respondent/Department : Shri Bhagirath Ramawat Date Conclusion of hearing : 12.11.2025 Pronouncement of order : 23.12.2025
O R D E R
[
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
1. The present appeal preferred by the Assessee is directed against the order, dated 12/02/2025, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] whereby the Ld. CIT(A) had set aside to the file of the Assessing Officer the appeal against the Assessment Order, dated 25/05/2023, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. Delay of 37 days in filing the present appeal is cond
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.