SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 25275

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SHANTILAL NAROTTAMDAS PANCHAL MALAD EAST – Appellant
Versus
ITO-41(3)(4) MUMBAI BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL K (SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.3570/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year:2017-2018) Shantilal Narottamdas Panchal B-16, Rajhans Coop. HSG Society Ltd.

Jitendra Road, Malad East, Mumbai - 400097 . Maharashtra [PAN: AATPP9539N] …………. Appellant Vs Income Tax Officer 41(3)(4), Mumbai Kautilya Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400051. Maharashtra. …………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Assessee : Shri Ravindra Poojary For the Respondent/Department : Shri Bhagirath Ramawat Date Conclusion of hearing : 12.11.2025 Pronouncement of order : 23.12.2025

O R D E R

[

Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:

1. The present appeal preferred by the Assessee is directed against the order, dated 12/02/2025, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] whereby the Ld. CIT(A) had set aside to the file of the Assessing Officer the appeal against the Assessment Order, dated 25/05/2023, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. Delay of 37 days in filing the present appeal is cond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top