SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 25387

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HYDERABAD BENCH)
SRIKANTH KAKATI KOTHAGUDEM – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 KOTHAGUDEM – Respondent


आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1341/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2018-2019 Srikanth Kakati, The Income Tax Officer, KOTHAGUDEM–507 Ward-1, vs.

101. Khammam. KOTHAGUDEM.

Telangana.

PIN –507 101.

PAN CSUPK1347N Telangana.

(Appellant) (Respondent)

िनधा१ौरती (cid:554)ारा /Assessee by: MS ML Niharika, Advocate राज(cid:830) व (cid:554)ारा /Revenue by: MS Kritika Jaiswal, Sr. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 18.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 24.12.2025 आदेश/ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT :

This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 30.05.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment year 2018-2019.

2. There is a delay of 25 days in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed a petition/ affidavit for explaining the cause of delay of 25 days in filing the present appeal.

3. We have heard the learned AR as well as learned DR and carefully perused the contents of the affidavit filed by the assessee. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top