INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
BLUES IT INNOVATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO - 12(1)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent
ITA 6297/MUM/2025[2011-12]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
J “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 6297/Mum /2025 (AY: 2011-12)
ITA No. 6298/Mum /2025 (AY: 2012-13)
ITA No. 6299/Mum/2025 (AY: 2013-14)
ITA No. 6300/Mum/2025 (AY: 2014-15)
(Physical hearing)
Blues IT Innovations India Private Add/ JCIT(A)/
Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24, Vs Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(3)
Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi, Room No. 145A, Ist Floor,
Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road,
Mumbai-400020
[PAN: AACCB4562D]
Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue
ITA No. 6465/Mum/2025 (AY: 2011-12)
Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(1) Blues IT Innovations India Private
Room No. 129, Ist Floor, Vs Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24,
Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi,
Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067
[PAN: AACCB4562D]
Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue
Assessee by Shri Vimal Punamia, CA/ AR
Revenue by Shri Aditya Rai, Sr. DR
Date of Institution of appeal (s) 04.10.2025 & 09.10.2025
Date of hearing 24.12.2025
Date of pronouncement 24.12.2025
Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act
PER BENCH, JUDICIAL MEMBER;
1. This group of five appeal, out of which two cross appeal for 2011-12
and other three appeal by assessee for A.Y. 2012-13, 2013-14 &
2014-15 are direct the separate orders of ld. CIT(A) all dated
07.08.2025. In all the appeals the assessee as well as revenue has
##PAGE2##ITA No(s) 6297 to 6300/Mum/2025
And ITA No. 6465/Mum/2025
Blue IT Innovation India Pvt Limited
(AY 2011-12 to 2014-15)
raised certain common / interconnected grounds of appeal
therefore, with the consent of parties on the appeals were clubbed,
heard together and are decided by common order to avoid the
conflicting decisions. For appreciation of fact, facts in A.Y. 2011-12
are treated as lead case. In A.Y. 2011-12 both the parties have
failed their respective grounds of appeals. The assessee in its appeal
has raised following grounds:
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, The Ld.
CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by the Ld. AO of
Rs.25,25,208/- on account of purchase made by the assessee treating
them as bogus non-genuine expenditure under section 69C of Income
Tax Act.
2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, The Ld.
CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by the Ld. AO of Rs.
25,25,208/- being 100% of purchases without considering that the
corresponding sales have been offered to tax in return of income.
3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)
erred in confirming the additions made by the Ld. AO solely relying on
the information received from investigation conducted by Sales Tax
Authority and without conducting any independent inquires and
application of his mind.
4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)
erred in confirming the additions made by the Ld. AO without providing
cross examination of the information relied upon by the Ld. AO which
has been the primary base for making the said additions.
5. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)
erred in passing the assessment order without considering the
documents and submissions submitted during the assessment
procedure.
6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)
erred in confirming the rejection of the books of accounts made by the
Ld. AO under section 145(3) of the IT Act, 1961.
7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, The Ld.
CIT(A) erred in confirming the order passed by the Ld. AO under
section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of income tax Act which is passed against the
principal of natural justice
2
##PAGE3##ITA No(s) 6297 to 6300/Mum/2025
And ITA No. 6465/Mum/2025
Blue IT Innovation India Pvt Limited
(AY 2011-12 to 2014-15)
a. No reassessment can be made just to make an enquiry or
verification
b. Reassessment proceeding cannot be initiate merely on the
information received from investigation wing.
c. Reassessment proceed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.