INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
NISAR EBRAHIM OOKABHOY MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 16(3)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण (cid:13)य(cid:14)य पीठ मुंबई म(cid:21)(cid:22)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM &
SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM I.T.A. No.6638/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-21)
Nisar Ebrahim Ookabhoy, ITO, Westbay Apts. Aakar Bhawan Flat 1704, Jarimari Road, Vs. Ward 16(3)(1), Bandra (W), Mumbai - 400050 Mumbai-400020 PAN: AAAPO0959N Revenue-(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7) / Appellant Assessee- (cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:7) / Respondent :
Assessee by : Shri Sunil Nahta Revenue by : Shri Sajeev Bhagar, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing 22.12.2025 :
Date of Pronouncement : 24.12.2025
O R D E R
Per Arun Khodpia, AM:
The captioned appeal is filed by the ASSESEE, directed against the order of Addl. / Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Surat [for short “ld. CIT(A)”] dated 19.08.2025 for the AY 2020-21, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 25.11.2021 for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21, issued by the CPC, Bangaluru.
2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in the present appeal are culled out as under:
1. On the facts and circumstance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.