INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
G S AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED DELHI – Appellant
Versus
DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-6 DELHI DELHI – Respondent
ITA 4289/DEL/2025[2015-16]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
and
SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.4289/DEL/2025
(Assessment Year: 2015-16)
G.S. Automobiles Private Limited, vs. DCIT, Central Circle 6,
B – 26, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase II, Delhi.
Delhi – 110 020.
(PAN : AADCG1150B)
(APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT)
ASSESSEE BY : Shri Neeraj Mangla, CA
REVENUE BY : Shri Jitender Singh, CIT DR
Date of Hearing : 19.11.2025
Date of Order : 30.12.2025
O R D E R
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi – 24 [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for
short] dated 19.06.2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 raising
following grounds of appeal :-
“1. That the orders passed by Ld. AO u/s 153C of the Act as well as
appellate order passed by Ld. CIT(A) are bad in law and are passed in
contravention of prevailing law as well as facts of the case, therefore liable to
be annulled.
2. That assumption of jurisdiction of Ld. AO in consequence of order
passed by Ld. PCIT u/s 127(3) of the Act of the Act is illegal and not tenable
under the law because of said order being mechanical and being passed
##PAGE2##2
ITA No.4289/DEL/2025
without recording reasons for transfer of case of assessee which was
mandatory pre-condition specified as per the provisions of See.. 127(2)(a) of
the Act.
3. That the assessment proceedings undertaken in case of assessee by Ld.
AO u/s 153C of the Act are illegal and not tenable under the law because
recording of consolidated satisfaction note for A.Y. 2011-12 to A.Y. 2017-18.
4. That the Ld. AO grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in
assessing repaid loan of Rs. 50,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of
the Act.
5. That the Ld. AO grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in
assessing loan of Rs. 50,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act
despite discharge of onus cast upon assessee to substantiate genuineness of the
same.
6. That the Ld. AO grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in making
addition of Rs.1,50,000/- u/s 69C of the Act.
7. That Ld. AO grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in not
adjudicating objections to satisfaction' note filed by assessee company during
assessment proceedings.
8. That Ld. AO grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in holding the
assessee company to be "such other person" as defined u/s 153C of the Act.
9. That the Ld. AO grossly erred in law and in facts of the case in making
additions to income of assessee relying on statements and evidences which
were not provided to assessee for rebuttal during assessment proceedings.
10. That the assessment order passed u/s 153C of the Act is further not
sustainable under the law as no opportunity of cross examination of persons
whose statements were relied upon was allowed.
11. That the assessment order passed by Ld. AO is further not sustainable
under the law because of getting and granting of proper approval u/s 153D of
the Act.
2. At the outset, ld. AR of the assessee stressed for ground no.3 and
submitted that the assessment proceedings undertaken in case of assessee
by AO under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the
Act’) are illegal and not tenable under the law because of recording of
##PAGE3##3
ITA No.4289/DEL/2025
consolidated satisfaction note for A.Y. 2011-12 to A.Y. 2017-18. He
submitted that the consolidated satisfaction note for AYs 2011-12 to
2017-18 was recorded by the Assessing Officer for proceedings u/s 153C
of the Act at pages 3 to 5 of the assessment order. He further submitted
that from the perusal of said satisfaction note, it is evident that Assessing
Officer failed to demonstrate live and direct nexus between the seized
material and relevant assessment year and even quantum of alleged
undisclosed income was not mentioned in the satisfaction note. He
pleaded that the assessment proceedings initiated u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3)
be quashed on this ground alone and in this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.