INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (KOLKATA BENCH)
SHREE KRISHNA GYANODAYA FLOUR MILLS PVT. LTD. KOLKATA – Appellant
Versus
ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3) KOLKATA – Respondent
ITA 2179/KOL/2025[2011-2012]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM
AND
SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM
ITA No.2179/KOL/2025
(Assessment Year: 2011-12)
Shree Krishna Gyanodaya
ACIT, Central Circle 4(3)
Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Aaykar Bhawan Poorva
15th Floor, 46C, Chowringhee
Vs. 110, Kolkata-700107,
Road, Everest House, Kolkata-
West Bengal
700071, West Bengal
(Appellant) (
Respondent)
PAN No. AAHCS8774P
Assessee by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AR
Revenue by : Shri Sanat Kumar Raha, DR
Date of hearing: 01.12.2025
Date of pronouncement: 31.12.2025
O R D E R
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of
the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27(hereinafter
referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 30.07.2025 for the AY 2011-12.
2. The common issue raised in ground no.1 to 4 of assessee’s appeal is
against the order ld. CIT (A) upholding the reopening of assessment
u/s 147 read with section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act)
which was made by the ld. AO invalidly without satisfying the
necessary pre-conditions for reopening of assessment and
accordingly, the assessee prayed that the reopening of assessment
may kindly be quashed.
##PAGE2##Page | 2
ITA No. 2179/KOL/2025
Shree Krishna Gyanodaya Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd.
2.1. The facts in brief are that the assessee filed the return of income
u/s 139(1) of the Act on 30.09.2011, declaring total income at ₹nil.
The assessment was completed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act, assessing
the total income at ₹nil vide order dated 27.03.2014. Thereafter, the
case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing
notice u/s 148 of the Act on 30.03.2018, which was duly served upon
the assessee. The reopening was made after obtaining the necessary
sanction from the competent authority u/s 151(1) of the Act. The
assessee complied with the said notice by filing the return of income
on 25.04.2018, declaring nil income. Thereafter, the notice u/s 143(2)
and 142(1) along with questionnaire were issued which were not
complied with by the assessee. Thereafter, the show cause notice was
issued on 20.11.2018, as to why the assessment should not be
completed u/s 144 of the Act which was replied by the assessee by
filing the objections to the reopening of assessment vide letter dated
28.11.2018, which the ld. AO disposed off vide letter dated
16.12.2018. The assessee again filed the objections for reopening of
assessment. Finally, the ld. AO added ₹50.00 crores received by the
assessee from M/s Pahargoomiah Exports Ltd. u/s 68 of the Act.
2.2. The ld. CIT (A) confirmed the order of the ld. AO on legal issue
by upholding the reopening of assessment in a very cryptic manner.
2.3. The ld. AR vehemently submitted before us that the reopening of
assessment and the consequent order framed u/s
147/144/153A/143(3) of the Act dated 28.12.2018, is nullity and
invalid in the eyes of law on several counts. The ld. AR submitted that
first and foremost argument is that the assessment in this case has
been framed u/s 143(3)/153A vide order dated 27.03.2014 and
thereafter the reopening u/s 147 of the Act was made by issuing
notice u/s 148 of the Act on 30.03.2018. The ld AR agrued that
##PAGE3##Page | 3
ITA No. 2179/KOL/2025
Shree Krishna Gyanodaya Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd.
arguably and apparently the reopening of assessment was made after
a period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
Therefore, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the
reopening could have been made only in accordance with proviso to
Section 147 of the Act, which provides that where the assessment has
been framed u/s 143(3) of the Act, the reopening could only be made
u/s 147 of the Act, in accordance with the proviso to Section 147 of
the Act. The proviso provides that where the order u/s 143(3) of the
Act is framed and where reopening is to be made after the expiry of
four years from the end of the relevant assessment year then the
income escaped has to be attributed to the failure of the assessee to
file the return of income
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.