INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAJKOT BENCH)
DHRUTI JAYSUKHBHAI RANPARIYA JAMNAGAR – Appellant
Versus
THE ITO WARD-2 (6) JAMNAGAR JAMNAGAR – Respondent
ITA 536/RJT/2025[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण,राजकोट Ûयायपीठ,राजकोट।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
आयकर अपील स/ं.ITA No. 536/RJT/2025
Assessment Year: 2018-19
Dhruti Jaysukhbhai Ranpariya Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(6),
Dhareshwar Appartment 56, Jamnagar, Aaykar Bhawan, 4th
बनाम/
Digvijay Plot, Floor, Manek Center, Nehru Road,
Vs.
Jamnagar (Guj) -361005 Jamnagar (Guj) -361006
èथायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.PAN/GIR No.: AQKPR6633C
(अपीलाथê/Assessee) : (ÿÂयथê/Respondent)
/Assessee by : Shri Hardik Vora, AR
(cid:467)नधा(cid:91)(cid:464)रती क(cid:551) ओर से
Revenue by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR
राजèव क(cid:551) ओर से/
Date of Hearing : 16/12/2025
सनु वाई क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख/
Date of Pronouncement : 31/12/2025
घोषणा क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख/
आदेश / O R D E R
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year
2018-19, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by National Faceless Appeal
Centre (NFAC), Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [in short,
“CIT(A)”] dated 01.08.2025 which in turn arises out of an assessment order
passed by Assessing Officer dated 26.04.2021.
2. Although, this appeal filed by the assessee, for assessment year 2018-19,
contains multiple ground of appeals, however, at the time of hearing we have
carefully perused all the grounds raised by the assessee and noted that the solitary
##PAGE2##ITA No. 536/RJT/2025
Dhruti J Ranpariya
grievance of the assessee in this appeal is that Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming
addition of Rs.1,78,17,600/-, on account of genuine gift received from husband,
out of natural love and affection.
3. Succinctly, the factual panorama of the case is that assessee before us is an
Individual.The assessee filed return of income in ITR-4 for assessment year (AY)
2018-19 on 24.07.2018, declaring income from business and profession of
Rs.4,52,134/- and income from other sources of Rs.39,991/- and assessee has
opted for presumptive taxation scheme u/s 44ADA of the Act thereby declaring
gross receipts at Rs.4,52,134/-. The assessee`s case was selected under CASS for
complete scrutiny to examine the issue “exempt income”. The notice u/s 143(2)
of the Act was issued electronically on the assessee, on 22.09.2019. The notice
u/s 142(1) of the Act, dated 18.11.2020 was issued to the assessee calling for the
details as appended in the notice. In response to the various notices, the assessee
submitted details and documents before the assessing officer.During the
assessment proceedings, the assessing officer observed from the return of income
filed by the assessee, that the assessee has claimed to have received a sum of
Rs.1,78,17,600/- as gift, from her husband, out of natural and love and affection.
The said sum of Rs.1,78,17,600/-, has been claimed by the assessee, as exempt.
However, the assessing officer was of the view that assessee has not produced
sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the gift, relationship with the
donor and documents evidencing the creditworthiness of the donor. Therefore,
assessing officer made addition, in the hands of the assessee, under the provisions
of Section 69A of the Act to the tune of Rs.1,78,17,600/-.
4. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter
in appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who has confirmed the action of Assessing Officer.
The ld.CIT(A) noticed that there is no element of natural love and affection, and
Page | 2
##PAGE3##ITA No. 536/RJT/2025
Dhruti J Ranpariya
genuineness of the gift has not been proved by the assessee, therefore, ld.CIT(A)
confirmed the addition made by the assessing officer.
5. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal
before us.
6. Learned Counsel for the assessee vehemently argued that assessee received the
gift from her husband out of natural love and affection, and for tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.