SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 4887

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
MOHAMMAD UMAR ABDUL HASAN KHAN (THROUGH LEGAL HEIR WIFE HASEENA BANO) BOISER – Appellant
Versus
WARD 1 PALGHAR PALGHAR – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K (SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.8815/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year:2020-2021)

Mohammad Umar Abdul Hasan Khan (through legal heir wife Haseena Bano)

Sanjay Nagar, Opp. Ram Mandir, Nawapur, Palghar, Mumbai – 401501. Maharashtra.

[PAN: AWWPK1416A] …………. Appellant Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1, Palghar Chintupada Road, Udhyog Nagar, Palghar – 401404. Maharashtra. …………. Respondent Appearance For the Appellant/Assessee : Shri Kirit Sheth For the Respondent/Department : Shri Bhagirath Ramawat Date Conclusion of hearing : 19.02.2026 Pronouncement of order : 24.02.2026

O R D E R

[

Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:

1. The present appeal preferred by the legal heir of the deceased Assessee is directed against the order, dated 18/09/2025, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] whereby the Ld. CIT(A) had disposed off the appeal setting aside the Assessment Order, dated 03/12/2024, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top