INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
ACIT CIRCLE-3 GURUGRAM GURGARON – Appellant
Versus
PERFETTI VAN MELLE INIDA PRIVATE LIMITED GURGAON – Respondent
ITA 623/DEL/2025[2010]
##PAGE1##
P ag e | 1
ITA No.623/Del/2025
Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt. Limited (AY: 2010)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“B” BENCH, DELHI
BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER &
SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.623/Del/2025
(Assessment Year:2010-11)
ACIT, Circle-3 Vs. Perfetti Van Melle India
2nd Floor, HSHDC Pvt. Limited,
Building, Shankar Chowk, 47, Milestone Delhi Jaipur
Gurugram, Highway Manesar
Haryana – 122001 Haryana - 122051
(cid:1)थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AAACP2626A
Appellant .. Respondent
Appellant by : Sh. Anmol Anand, Adv.
Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Adv
Respondent by : Ms. Pooja Swaroop, CIT (DR)
Date of Hearing 07.01.2026
Date of Pronouncement 05.03.2026
O R D E R
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated
07.11.2024 of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) (hereinafter
referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in DIN &
##PAGE2##P ag e | 2
ITA No.623/Del/2025
Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt. Limited (AY: 2010)
Order No : ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070183338(1) arising out of the
order dated 23.11.2017 u/s143(3) r.w.s u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the DCIT, Circle-3, Gurgaon
for AY: 2010-11.
2. Heard and perused the records. The Assessee is engaged in the business
of manufacturing Candies, Gums, Jelly and proprietary Ayurvedic products
from its factories located at Manesar (Haryana), Rudrapur (Uttarakhand) and
Chennai (Tamil Nadu). Some of the products manufactured by the Assessee
include Big Babol, Center Fresh, Center Fruit, Alpenliebe, Mentos,
Happydent, Chlormint with Herbasol, etc.
3. As far as the year under consideration is concerned, i.e., the third year
of production at the manufacturing unit at Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, the
Assessee claimed a deduction of INR 90,90,45,413/- under section 80-IC of
the Act in respect of the profits earned by the manufacturing unit at
Rudrapur, Uttarakhand. However, since the deduction could not exceed the
total income, the deduction claimed by the Assessee under section 80-IC of
the Act was restricted to INR 80,77,02,717/- and accordingly, a NIL return
##PAGE3##P ag e | 3
ITA No.623/Del/2025
Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt. Limited (AY: 2010)
was filed by the Assessee for AY 2010-11. That apart, the Assessee furnished
audit report in form no. 10CCB of the Act for AY 2010-11.
3.1 The case of the Assessee for AY 2010-11 was picked up for scrutiny,
and a final assessment order dated 05.01.2015 was passed by the AO under
section 144C(13) read with section 143(3) of the Act. In the said order, the
AO accepted the eligibility of the Assessee to make a claim of deduction
under section 80-IC of the Act. Thereafter, the Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax, Gurgaon ("PCIT"), vide order dated 21.02.2017, passed under
section 263 of the Act, set aside the order dated 05.01.2015 to the extent of
the claim under section 80-IC of the Act and directed the AO to pass a fresh
assessment order in the case of Assessee for AY 2010-11.
3.2 Pursuant thereto, the AO vide assessment order dated 23.11.2017
passed for AY 2010-11 disallowed the claim of INR 80,77,02,717/- under
section 80-IC of the Act on the basis that the Assessee was not entitled to
claim deduction on the articles such as "chewing gum", "candy" and "bubble
gum" as the said products were not listed in the Fourteenth Schedule.
4. Ld. Counsel has submitted that this finding of the AO is in complete
ignorance of the fact that the Assessee had claimed deduction under section
##PAGE4##P ag e | 4
ITA No.623/Del/2025
Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt. Limited (AY: 2010)
80-IC(2)(a)(ii) of the Act, which allows deduction in respect of all products
which do not fall in the Thirteenth Schedule. Since none of the products that
Assessee manufactures from its factory at Rudrapur fall within the Thirteenth
Schedule, the AO ought to have allowed Assessee's claim.
4.1 Furthermore, the observation of the AO in the assessment order dated
23.11.2017 passed for AY 2010-11 is c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.