SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 5192

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SENTHILKUMAR THANGARAJ MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO-WARD 42(3)(3) MUMBAI MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM ITA No.8221/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17)

Senthilkumar Thangaraj ITO-WARD 42(3)(3), Mumbai

204, B-Wing, Eshwari Co-op Society, Room No. 610, Kautilya Bhavan, C- Rajendra Prasad Nagar, 60 feet Road, 41 to C-43, G-Block, BKC, Bandra Vs.

Matunga Labour Camp, Mumbai (East), Mumbai-400051

400019.

PAN/GIR No. ALNPT1800D (Appellant) : (Respondent Assessee by : Shri. Himanshu Gandhi Respondent by : Shri. Sanjeev Bhagat – Sr. AR Date of Hearing : 05/03/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 06 /03/2026

O R D E R

Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM:

The instant appeal of the assessee was preferred against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi order passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2016-17, date of Order 18/09/2025. The impugned order emanated from the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (for brevity “Ld. AO”), order passed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s, 144B of the Act), date of the order 26/03/2023.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a salaried individual who filed the return of income under section 139 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top