INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
SENTHILKUMAR THANGARAJ MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO-WARD 42(3)(3) MUMBAI MUMBAI – Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM ITA No.8221/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17)
Senthilkumar Thangaraj ITO-WARD 42(3)(3), Mumbai
204, B-Wing, Eshwari Co-op Society, Room No. 610, Kautilya Bhavan, C- Rajendra Prasad Nagar, 60 feet Road, 41 to C-43, G-Block, BKC, Bandra Vs.
Matunga Labour Camp, Mumbai (East), Mumbai-400051
400019.
PAN/GIR No. ALNPT1800D (Appellant) : (Respondent Assessee by : Shri. Himanshu Gandhi Respondent by : Shri. Sanjeev Bhagat – Sr. AR Date of Hearing : 05/03/2026 Date of Pronouncement : 06 /03/2026
O R D E R
Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM:
The instant appeal of the assessee was preferred against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi order passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2016-17, date of Order 18/09/2025. The impugned order emanated from the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (for brevity “Ld. AO”), order passed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s, 144B of the Act), date of the order 26/03/2023.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a salaried individual who filed the return of income under section 139 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.