SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 25874

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
ACIT-19(1) MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
PARUL DIAMOND MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H(SMC)” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

AND SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

Assessment Year: 2007-08 ACIT – 19(1), Mumbai Vs. Parul Diamond

30-a, Amar Wing Tirupati Apartment B.D. Desai Road Opp. Mahalaxmi Temple Maharashtra - 400026 [PAN: AAAFP4784E]

(Appellant) (Respondent)

C.O. No. 53/Mum/2025 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Parul Diamond Vs. ACIT – 19(1), Mumbai

30-a, Amar Wing Tirupati Apartment B.D. Desai Road Opp. Mahalaxmi Temple Maharashtra - 400026 [PAN: AAAFP4784E]

(Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant by Shri Govind Javeri, A/R Respondent by Shri Pravin Salunkhe, Sr. D/R Date of Hearing 04.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement 02.12.2025 ORDER Per Bench:

The present appeal by the revenue and cross-objection by the assessee are filed against the order dated 31/12/2024 passed by the ld. CIT(A) – 51, Mumbai on following grounds:-

Grounds of appeal in r/o ITA No. 6992/Mum/2024:

“1. “ Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,

Ld. CIT(A) has erred in restricting the addition to 6% as against the 100%

addition of Rs. 6,66,602/- made by the AO on account alleged bogus purchases from M/s.Mohan Enterprises, a dumm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top