SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 26098

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HYDERABAD BENCH)
KARTHIK KUMAR KYATHAM NIZAMABAD – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD-1 ADILABAD – Respondent


FINAL NOTICES TO CHECK आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘SMC’ Bench, Hyderabad BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1658/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2020-2021 Karthik Kumar The Income Tax Officer, Kyatham, BALKONDA. Ward-1, vs.

NIZAMABAD-503218 ADILABAD – 504 001.

PAN CKMPK5137N Telangana.

(Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा१ौरती (cid:554)ारा /Assessee by: CA Phaneendra Nag राज(cid:830) व (cid:554)ारा /Revenue by: B K Vishnu Priya, Sr. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 10.12.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19.12.2025 आदेश/ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT :

This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 29.09.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment year 2020-2021.

2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :

1. “The order of appeal passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act dt. 29.09.2025 is erroneous both on facts and in law to the extent the order is prejudicial to the interest of the appellant.

2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal, without admitting the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top