SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 6019

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI MUMBAI – Respondent


आदेश /ORDER

PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM:

The present appeals have been filed by the Revenue challenging the different impugned orders dt. 12.06.2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) / CIT(A) for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2011-12.

2. Since all the issues involved in these appeals are common and identical and belongs to one assessee therefore, they have been clubbed, heard together and consolidated order is being passed. Firstly, we shall take ITA No. 5385/Mum/2025, A.Y 2006-07 as lead case and facts narrated therein.

ITA No. 5385/Mum/2025, A.Y 2006-07

The ground of appeal as raised by the Revenue:

“1. "On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that the assessee is "wholly or substantially financed by the Government within the meaning of section 10(23C)(iiiab), by considering non-recurring elements such as capital grants, land, and infrastructure, which are neither recurring nor reflected in the Income & Expenditure Account."

2. "On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC erred in holding that the term "substantially financed by the Go

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top