SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 6320

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (JABALPUR BENCH)
ANADIE NATH MISSHRA, Accountant Member
Rai Sahib Bhaiyalal Dubey Educational and Medical Charitable Trust – Appellant
Versus
ACIT-CPC, Bangaluru – Respondent
I.T.A. No.186/JAB/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Dhiraj Ghai, C.A.
For the Respondents: Rahul Padha, JC-2

Debatable issues on charitable trust exemption under section 11 cannot be disallowed via prima facie adjustment in section 143(1) processing without assessee's explanation; matter remitted for verification.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 12A, 143(1) - Charitable trust exemption - Processing of return under section 143(1) - Adjustment disallowing expenditure claimed under section 11(2) enhancing income from Nil to Rs.17,41,999/- - Debatable issues involving eligibility for exemption and application of income cannot be adjudicated ex parte under section 143(1) - Prima facie adjustments limited to apparent errors; explanation of assessee required for debatable matters. (Paras B, B.1, B.2)

(B) Section 143(1) - Scope of intimation - Adjustment on debatable issues like accumulation/deemed income under section 11 impermissible without hearing assessee - Capital expenditure omission in audit report rectifiable upon verification - Matter remanded for fresh consideration with opportunity of hearing. (Paras B.2, C)

Facts of the case:
Charitable trust filed Nil return claiming exemption under section 11 on application of income including Rs.17,41,999/- expenditure. CPC processed return under section 143(1) disallowing exemption, assessing income at Rs.17,41,999/- and raising demand. First appellate authority dismissed appeal. Assessee approached Tribunal submitting CA certificate clarifying expenditure coverage within 15% accumulation limit and citing precedents on scope of section 143(1).

Findings of Court:
Impugned appellate order set aside; issues remanded to Assessing Officer for verification of CA certificate and passing order in accordance with law after reasonable opportunity to assessee.

Issues: Validity of disallowance under section 143(1) for charitable exemption claim; whether expenditure qualifies under section 11; leviability of interest under sections 234A, 234B; whether intimation bad in law for mechanical order on disputable issues.

Ratio Decidendi: Debatable issues requiring assessee's explanation cannot form basis for prima facie adjustment under section 143(1) ex parte proceedings; verification of audit details and expenditure application needed before finalizing exemption claim.

Result: Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes.

ORDER

(A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.186/JAB/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2020-21 against impugned appellate order dated 23.10.2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 25/1069887964(1) of Ld. Addl/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“JCIT(A)” for short], the First Appellate Authority.

(B) The dispute in the present appeal started with the adjustment made during processing of assessee’s return u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”, for short) whereby intimation was issued and adjustment was made to assessee’s income enhancing the assessee’s income from returned income of Nil to Rs.17,41,999/-. The assessee’s appeal against the aforesaid adjustment was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide impugned appellate order dated 23.10.2024. In the course of appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”), a paper book containing the following particular was filed from the assessee’s side: -

(B.1) The aforesaid paper book contained copy of assessee’s written submissions filed during the appellate proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A); which is reproduced below, for the ease of reference: -

“In addition to verbal submissions advanced by the counsel, I would like to submit as under for your honors kind consideration.

1. In the first ground of appeal the assessee is contesting the assessee society has received intimation under section 143(1) by CPC vide DIN no CPC/2021/A7/164799645 of dated 30/11/2021 and assessing the income of Rs 17,41,999/- of the assessee society and demand of Rs 3,72,020 was determined.

1.1 OURS SUMBISSION;- That the assessee society has received intimation under section 143(1) by CPC vide DIN no CPC/2021/A7/164769645 dated 30.11.2021 assessing the income of Rs. 17,41,999/ of the assessee trust and demand of Rs. 3,72,020/- was determined therein on account of disallowance of expenses as claimed under section 11 of the income tax act. Copy of intimation under section143(1) as received is enclosed as page no 8 to 27 of this reply.

1.2 Assessee is a charitable institution and is registered under section 12A vide order dated 22.07.1999 and accordingly has claimed exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. Copy of registration certificate under section is enclosed as page no 28 of this reply. In lieu of above said registration assessee trust has rightly claimed the deduction of Rs.17,41,99/- under section 11(2) and hence income of trust remains as NIL. The copy of computation of income of assessee is also enclosed as page number 29 of this reply. Henceforth it is requested that as assessee has correctly claimed the exemption under section 11A and AO has accepted same in next years intimation under section 143(1). Copy of intimation under section 143(1) of next years are enclosed as page number 30 to 34 of this reply, hence AO may kindly be directed to consider income of the assessee as NIL instead of Rs 17,41,999/-.

2. In the second ground of the appeal the assessee has contested the assessee society is a charitable institution and is registered under section 12A vide order dated F. No. CIT-I/JBP/TECH/80G/07/09-10 dated 17.12.2009 and has claimed exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

2.1 OUR SUMBISSION: In lieu of submission given in para 1.1 to 1.2 above it is proved that Id AO was not justified in considering the aggregate of income (referred to under section 11 and 12) at Rs.1,32,77,585/ when it was duly agreed by Id AO himself at page 18 of intimation under section 143(1) that the expenditures were to the tune of Rs 17,41,999/-. Ie the expenses were agreed to be in parallance with the return filled and CPC has not shown there disagreement on quantum of the expenses. At this stage when assessee is having due registration under section 11 and 12 making expenses allowable deduction against income the disallowance of genuine expenses are against as natural justice and law. Henceforth the income of the assessee may kindly be ordered to at NIL

3. In the third and four

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top