SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 6777

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (PUNE BENCH)
PANDURANG ARJUN PADIR BEED – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 AHMEDNAGAR – Respondent


आदेश/ORDER

The captioned appeals at the instance of respective assessee(s) pertaining to A.Yrs. 2020-21 and 2021-22 are directed against the separate orders framed by Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi arising of respective Intimation orders passed u/s.143(1)(a) of the Act.

2. Since common issues have been raised in the above appeals I proceed to adjudicate these appeals by way of this consolidated order for the sake of convenience.

3. The common issue raised in these bunch of appeals is that whether the amount received from Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) on account of the forced retirement through the BNSL Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019 is in the nature of Retrenchment Compensation and is a Capital receipt not liable to be taxed as per the provisions of section 10(10B) of the Act.

4. Brief facts relating to all the assessee(s) in the instant appeals are that they are employed with BSNL which is under administrative control of Department of Telecommunications, Govt. of India. In order to revive BSNL, the Union Cabinet in its meeting dated 23.10.2019 approved the revival plan of BSNL and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, Mumbai (MTNL) vide Office M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top