SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 7303

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
Pawan Singh, Judicial Member
The Navyug Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
DCIT, Circle – 19(3), Mumbai – Respondent
ITA No. 2811/MUM/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arati Vissanji, Shalin S. Divatia
For the Respondents: Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui

The deeming provision of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act cannot be applied to sales of land where the transferor lacks absolute ownership, the property is encumbered by public reservation, and the transaction is legally rooted in a pre-existing MOU dated prior to the section's enactment.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 50C - Applicability of deeming provision - Sale of land - Assessee entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 2000 regarding a plot reserved for public purpose - Conveyance deed executed in 2003 after insertion of Section 50C - Whether Section 50C is applicable when land had restricted rights and obligations were pre-existing - Court held that the deeming fiction of Section 50C could not be applied mechanically where the property did not confer absolute ownership or where the transaction was in furtherance of a pre-existing obligation entered prior to the enactment - Appellate authority noted consistency in the department's position where similar additions were not pursued in other related cases. (Paras 9, 10 and 11)

Facts of the case:
The assessee, one of fourteen societies, sold a common plot following an MOU signed in 2000. While the sale deed was executed in 2003, the Assessing Officer invoked Section 50C to treat the Stamp Duty Valuation Authority (SVA) value as the sale consideration, resulting in significant additions. The assessee contended that they held only limited rights over the land due to its reservation for public purposes and the MOU pre-dated the legislative introduction of Section 50C.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the assessee was not an absolute owner and held only limited, encumbered rights over the plot, making the Section 50C valuation inapplicable. Furthermore, it noted the department's acceptance in past related proceedings that Section 50C did not apply to this specific transaction.

Issues: Whether the provisions of Section 50C are applicable to the transfer of property rights where the agreement pre-dates the act and the seller lacks absolute ownership.

Ratio Decidendi: The deeming provisions of Section 50C cannot be applied universally to transfers where the inherent nature of the property (reserved for public purpose) and the existence of a pre-existing MOU negate any potential for revenue leakage.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. procedural background and foundational facts of the assessment dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. contentions regarding the applicability of section 50c versus pre-existing contractual obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. judicial determination that limited property rights and previous department stances exclude the application of section 50c. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act

PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER;

1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 18.07.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2004-05.

2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a co-operative society. The assessing officer initiated the assessment proceeding pursuant to order of ld. PCIT dated 19.03.2014 passed under section 263. The assessing officer during assessment recorded that assessee along with 13 other co-operative societies owned a common plot conveyance deed (sale deed) of which was executed in their favor by Bombay Housing Board. The assessee owned only 5.00% share of said common plot admeasuring 4780.6 square meters bearing plot no. 4A/7 bearing CTS No. 194A/2 of Village Juhu, part of Juhu Ville Parle Development (JVPD) Scheme at East West Road No. 3, Village Juhu, Taluka Andheri. The said piece of land was sold by assessee and other co-operative societies to Vasundhara Co-operative Housing Society Limited, which is co-operative housing society of Maharashtra cadre of Indian Police Services (IPS) officers. The assessee has shown sale consideration of Rs. 77,14,920/- as per agreement dated 14.05.2003, whereas market value of said property as per Stamp Duty Valuation Authority (SVA) was determined at Rs. 11.88 crore. The assessing officer was of the view that on the sale transaction of such plot the provision of section 50C is applicable. The assessing officer issued show cause notice dated 27.01.2015 proposing addition as per the provisions of section 50C. The assessee filed its reply dated 23.03.2015. The contents of reply of assessee are recorded on page no. 2 to 5 of assessment order. The assessee in its reply submitted that their case has been reopened pursuant to order under section 263 dated 19.03.2014. The order of ld. PCIT under section 263 is a subject matter of appeal before Tribunal and hearing is fixed on 26.11.2015. Therefore, proceeding be kept in abeyance till then. The assessee also stated that similar issue was earlier considered in the order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 143(3).

3. In without prejudice submission, the assessee while explaining the fact stated that impugned plot of land as per the scheme of Government of Maharashtra was reserved for Recreation Ground, Garden, Police Head Quarters as per Development Control Regulations (DCR) 1991. In 1975, the possession of plot was taken by Home Department, Government of Maharashtra. The possession receipt was issued by Public Works Department, Government of Maharashtra. The provisions of section 50C cannot apply to sale of plot of land to Government or where the plot is reserved for particular purpose, possession of which has already been taken. In 2000 officials of Police Department proposed a housing society and entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with 14 co-operative societies of JVPD scheme. As per MOU, a sum of Rs. 14,19,670/- was paid as an advance by the proposed society. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) was executed between the societies of IPS officers and 14 societies of JVPD scheme including of assessee on 14.05.2003 for a total consideration of Rs. 77,14,920/- against the proposed consideration of Rs. 70,98,350/- as agreed in MOU dated 25.01.2000. The provision of section 50C was introduced with effect from 01.04.2003. The execution of conveyance deed dated 14.05.2003 was in furtherance fulfilling of pre-existing obligation and therefore, rigors of section 50C will not apply. As per Circular No. 5/2010 dated 03.06.2010, issued by Central Board of Dir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top