SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 7493

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
LATE. SUBRAMANIYAN BY L.H.S. VELLINGIRI GOBICHETTIPALAYAM – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 2(1) ERODE – Respondent


आदेश/ORDER

PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M:

This appeal by the assessee represented by legal heir is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 30.09.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.

2. The assessee is an individual and passed away on 06.07.2020. The A.O based on information received that there was cash deposits maintained in the IDBI Bank to the tune of Rs. 51,70,000/-, reopened the assessment by issue of notice u/s. 148A(b) of the Act on the legal heir of the assessee. The A.O concluded the assessment by treating the entire amount as unexplained u/s. 69A of the Act. Aggrieved, further appeal before the CIT(A) was filed by the assessee represented by the legal heir. There was a delay of 360 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable stating that there was no sufficient cause for the delay.

3. There is a delay of 53 days in filing the appeal by the assessee. The assessee has filed condonation petition/affidavit stating the reasons for delay in filing the appeal. Having heard both th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top