SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 9505

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (RAIPUR BENCH)
DHANIRAM SAHU DURG – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD1(1) BHILAI BHILAI – Respondent


आयकर अपील(cid:547)य अ(cid:876)धकरण Ûयायपीठ “एक-सदèय” मामला रायपरु म(cid:581)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR (cid:302)ी पाथ (cid:91) सारथी चौधर(cid:547), Ûया(cid:467)यक सदèय के सम¢

BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.256/RPR/2026 (cid:467)नधा(cid:91)रण वष (cid:91) /Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dhaniram Sahu Borsi Bhata, P.O. Mohan Nagar, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 PAN: ALOPS9367B .......अपीलाथ(cid:568) / Appellant बनाम / V/s.

The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bhilai (C.G.) ……(cid:292)×यथ(cid:568) / Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR सुनवाई क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख / Date of Hearing : 16.04.2026 घोषणा क(cid:551) तार(cid:547)ख / Date of Pronouncement : 16.04.2026 आदेश / ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 13.01.2026 for the assessment year 2011-12 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2. At the time of hearing, none appeared for the assessee nor any adjournment petition has been filed. It is noted from Paras 5.3.2 & 5.3.3 of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)’s order that the addition has been susta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top