SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 9771

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
ABY T. VARKEY, Judicial Member, PADMAVATHY.S, Accountant Member
Sivasakthi Educational Trust – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
ITA No.3614/Chny/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. B.Ramakrishnan, FCA
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Sreekumar, JCIT

Corpus contributions towards capital expenditure like school construction excluded from aggregate annual receipts under section 10(23C)(iiiad); educational institution eligible for exemption if receipts below Rs.1 Crore threshold and activities substantiated.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 10(23C)(iiiad) - Exemption for educational institution - Aggregate annual receipts - Corpus contributions from trustees towards construction of school building, treated as liabilities in balance sheet, cannot be included in aggregate annual receipts for determining threshold of Rs.1 Crore - Such contributions are capital receipts not forming part of income - Institution running nursery school with provisional approval and obtained NOC for affiliation, incurring expenses on salaries, uniforms, transportation - Entitled to exemption despite surplus, as established for educational purposes. (Paras 3, 5, 6)

(B) Corpus donations - Specific purpose capital receipts like infrastructure development excluded from annual receipts computation under section 10(23C)(iiiad) - Registration under section 12AA not mandatory for exemption claim. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
Assessee trust filed return claiming exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) with gross receipts of Rs.97,79,371/- excluding trustees' corpus contribution of Rs.20,50,000/- utilised for school building construction. Assessing Officer included corpus contribution, held receipts exceeded Rs.1 Crore, denied exemption and taxed surplus of Rs.38,65,595/-. CIT(A) upheld. Tribunal examined financials showing educational expenses and approvals.

Findings of Court:
AO directed to exclude corpus contributions from receipts computation; gross receipts below Rs.1 Crore; educational activities substantiated by approvals, fees collection and expenses; exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) allowed.

Issues: Whether corpus contributions form part of aggregate annual receipts for section 10(23C)(iiiad) threshold; whether institution established solely for educational purposes despite ongoing construction and nursery operations.

Ratio Decidendi: Corpus contributions for specific capital purposes like building construction are not includible in aggregate annual receipts under section 10(23C)(iiiad); monetary limit not exceeded; running nursery with approvals and educational expenses satisfies existence for educational purposes.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. assessee's grounds and factual background of assessment denial. (Para 1 , 2)
2. assessee argues corpus contributions excluded from receipts. (Para 3)
3. dr relies on lower authorities; tribunal reviews facts. (Para 4)
4. corpus donations not included in annual receipts limit. (Para 5)
5. educational expenditures and approvals substantiate exemption claim. (Para 6)
6. appeal allowed; exemption u/s 10(23c)(iiiad) granted. (Para 7)

आदेश/ORDER

PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M:

This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 22.09.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20. The grounds raised by the assessee are as under:

“1. The order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, is contrary to the law, facts and circumstances of the case.

2. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, had erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in treating the contribution of the trustees amounting to Rs.20,50,000/- as donation instead of liabilities as shown in the Balance Sheet, thereby increasing the annual gross receipts to Rs. 1,18,29,371/- as against the actual gross receipts of Rs. 97,79,371/-, shown in the Income and expenditure account and consequently holding that the gross receipts exceeded Rs.1 Crore and denying the appellant's claim for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

3. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, erred in further holding that the appellant did not have valid approval from Competent Authority of running the said educational institutions, when actually the appellant had duly obtained approval to run educational institutions up to the Primary level (up to V Standard) from the Primary Education Officer, Nagapattinam, which was submitted to the CIT(A) in the appellate proceedings.

4. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, erred in upholding the Assessing Officer's action of bringing to tax the surplus of Rs.38,65,595/-, shown in Income and Expenditure Account is not for application for educational purposes.

For these grounds and such other grounds that may be adduced before or during the hearing of the appeal, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the Assessing Officer to accept the returned income and grant exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 and quash the assessment order dated 16.03.2021 and the CIT(A), NFAC order dated 22.09.2025.”

2. The assessee is a charitable trust and filed a return of income for A.Y 2019-20 on 28.06.2020 declaring Nil income. The assessee subsequently filed the revised return of income on 08.07.2020 and in the said revised return the assessee has claimed Rs. 97,79,371/- as exempt income u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The case was selected for scrutiny and the statutory notices were duly served on the assessee. The A.O called on the assessee to furnish details pertaining to expenditure towards educational activity during the year under consideration and the details as to how the assessee is entitled to claim exemption u/s. u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act when the receipts of the assessee during the year under consideration are more than Rs.1 Crore. The assessee submitted before the A.O that the assessee is in the process of development and construction of school building and the gross receipts along with trustees contributions and bank loans were fully utilized towards the object of the trust. The assessee further submitted that the receipts during the year is less than Rs.1 crore and the contributions towards corpus cannot be considered for the purpose of exemption u/s.10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The assessee also submitted that the assessee has obtained provisional approval for running of kinder garden school on 13.04.2018 and that the No O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top