SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 10133

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Altheon Enterprises Limited – Respondent
ITA No.280/Ahd/2022 | ITA No.281/Ahd/2022



Goodwill arising on amalgamation as excess consideration over net assets is an acquired depreciable intangible asset. The prospective ban on goodwill depreciation from AY 2021-22 does not affect prior years.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32(1)(ii), 43(1), 43(6)(c), 49(1)(iii)(e), 55(2)(a)(i), 55(2)(a)(ii) - Companies Act, 2013 - Section 133 - Depreciation on goodwill - Goodwill acquired in the process of amalgamation - Purchase method of accounting as per Accounting Standard 14 - The assessee, as the amalgamated company, is entitled to claim depreciation on goodwill arising from the amalgamation, as the goodwill was 'acquired' by way of purchase, i.e., the excess of consideration paid over the net assets of the amalgamating companies. The value of goodwill is to be taken at the purchase consideration paid, and provisions applicable to self-generated goodwill (section 55(2)(a)(ii), Explanation 7 to section 43(1), Explanation 2(b) to section 43(6)(c)) are not applicable. (Paras 3, 7, 8)

(B) Amendment by Finance Act, 2021 - The Finance Act, 2021, prospectively amended provisions to exclude 'Goodwill of a Business or Profession' from the definition of intangible assets and block of assets, and barred depreciation on it from AY 2021-22. For assessment years prior to this amendment, the right to claim depreciation on goodwill remains valid based on settled law, including the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Smifs Securities Ltd. (348 ITR 302). (Para 8)

(C) Valuation - The valuation of amalgamating companies by the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method, conducted by an independent valuer, cannot be rejected on mere suspicion by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer must bring out material defects in the valuation or seek a second technical opinion before substituting it with a different value. (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
The assessee company (Altheon Enterprises Limited, now known as Claris Limited) entered into a Composite Scheme of Arrangement, which included the amalgamation of three companies with it, approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on 29.10.2018. Pursuant to the scheme, the assessee issued shares to shareholders of the amalgamating companies. The excess of consideration paid (value of shares) over the net assets of the amalgamating companies was recognized as goodwill in accordance with Accounting Standard 14. For the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19, the assessee claimed depreciation on this goodwill, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) on the grounds that the goodwill was self-generated and its value was nil in the hands of the amalgamating companies, and that the valuation was inflated. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] allowed the depreciation claim, leading to the Revenue's appeal.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding that the Revenue's appeal was devoid of merits. The issue of depreciation on goodwill arising on amalgamation is settled by the Supreme Court in Smifs Securities Ltd. (supra). The goodwill was 'acquired' through the process of amalgamation, as the consideration paid was in excess of the net assets acquired. Therefore, the provisos and explanations cited by the A.O. (which deal with assets already existing in the books of the amalgamating company) were not applicable. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted that the Finance Act, 2021, which excluded goodwill from depreciable assets, is applicable prospectively from A.Y. 2021-22. Consequently, for the A.Ys. 2017-18 and 2018-19 in question, the assessee is entitled to the depreciation.

Issues: The main issue was whether the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on goodwill that arises in the hands of the amalgamated company due to amalgamation, where the goodwill represents the difference between the purchase consideration paid and the net assets taken over, and where the amalgamating companies had no recorded goodwill in their books.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that goodwill arising from a scheme of amalgamation, recorded as the excess of purchase consideration over net assets, is an asset 'acquired' by the amalgamated company. It is, therefore, a depreciable intangible asset under section 32(1)(ii) read with section 32(1), Explanation 3(b). The sixth proviso to section 32(1) and related provisions concerning pre-existing assets of the amalgamating company do not apply to such newly created goodwill. The right to claim depreciation is subject to the prospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. Result : Appeals dismissed.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • tax law
    • income tax
      • depreciation
        • intangible assets
      • amalgamation
        • tax implications (Para 2)
      • valuation
        • discounted cash flow method (Para 3)
  • practice and procedure
    • appeals (Para 1)

Table of Contents

1. Depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation under sections 32, 43, 55 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (Para 1 , 2 )

2. Revenue contends goodwill not depreciable; assessee claims allowance under section 32. (Para 3 , 4 )

3. Does the sixth proviso to section 32(1) limit depreciation on goodwill when the amalgamating company had no goodwill in its books?

No, the proviso applies only to pre-existing assets; where goodwill is first acquired by the amalgamated company as purchase consideration excess, it is not restricted. (Para 3 )

4. Can the Assessing Officer reject a valuation report prepared by an independent valuer using the DCF method on mere suspicion?

No, the AO must bring material defects or seek another expert opinion; mere suspicion is insufficient to discard a technically sound valuation. (Para 3 )

5. Does allotment of shares constitute valid payment for acquisition of goodwill for depreciation purposes?

Yes, payment through share allotment is a valid mode of consideration for acquiring goodwill, as upheld in case law. (Para 3 )

PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

These two appeals are filed by the Revenue as against separate appellate orders dated 20.05.2022 and 08-06-2022 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the assessment orders passed under section143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19 respectively. Since common issue of disallowance of depreciation on Goodwill is involved in both the assessment years, for the sake of convenience the same are disposed of by this common order

2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee company is engaged in the business of (i) manufacturing of solid Bio-Fuel and Wood Pallet (ii) Trading in solar Rooftop and Renewal Energy Devices (iii) trading in tissue culture plants and (iv) Product Development Services. For the Asst. Year 2017-18, the assessee filed its original return of income declaring Nil total income on 06.11.2017. Thereafter, pursuant to the Composite Scheme of Arrangement (Scheme) approved by Ahmedabad Bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) vide order dated 29.10.2018 the Assessee revised its return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 on 30.11.2018 declaring loss of Rs.752,51,42,451/-. The return was revised to give effect of the Scheme of Amalgamation approved by Ahmedabad Bench of NCLT vide order dated 29.10.2018.

2.1. Assessee's case was selected for Limited Scrutiny assessment and regular assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 29.12.2019 by disallowing the claim of depreciation on Goodwill of Rs. 771,66,20,460/- under section 32(1) r.w.s. 43(1) r.ws. 43(6)(c) r.w.s. 49(1)(iii)(e) r.w.s. 55(2)(a)(ii) of the Act and total income was determined at Rs.19,14,86,009/-.

3. Aggrieved against the order, the assessee filed an appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who held that the assessee company had acquired goodwill by way of purchase in the process of Amalgamation and hence the claim of depreciation on goodwill acquired at the time of Amalgamation is in accordance with the provisions of law and deleted the addition made by the A.O. by passing a speaking order as follows:

“After considering the appellants submissions and AO findings in the assessment order, following facts emerge:

a) It is apparent from the findings of the AO in the assessment order that the depreciation on goodwill was disallowed by the AO on the premise that there was no goodwill value in the books of the amalgamating companies. The AO has completely ignored the situation of purchase of goodwill by amalgamated company in the process of amalgamation as was the case in the facts of Smifs Securities Ltd. as well as in the case of Zydus Wellness Ltd decision. It has been clearly brought out by the appellant that the goodwill value was on the basis of differential between the consideration paid vs. value of net assets of amalgamating companies taken over Thus, in the current facts of the case where goodwill is acquired through purchase in the process of amalgamation, the provision of section 55(2)(a)(i) will apply rather than the AO's view point of applying section 55(2)(a)(ii) of the Act for considering the value of goodwill. In the first case, the value of goodwill is taken at purchase consideration paid for acquisition of goodwill where as in the second case, the value of goodwill generated in the process of business for the goodwill generating company is taken as Nil. For this factual reason that the appellant had acquired goodwill by way of purchase for consideration paid in the process of amalgamation, the provisions of the proviso to section 32(1), section 49(1)(ii)(e), Explanation 7 to section 43(1) and/or Explanation 2(b) to section 43(6)(c) and section 55(2)(a)(ii) are not applicable to the current facts of the case as argued and contended by the appellant in the submissions reproduced herein above. This view point also gets support from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top