SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 10590

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH)
LAKSHMANA SWAMY VEERANKI YALAMALKUDURU – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3) VIJAYAWADA – Respondent


आदेश/ORDER 

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM:

This appeal by the assessee against order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter in short “Ld. CIT(A)”] for the A.Y. 2016-17.

2. The Learned Authorised Representative, Shri C. Subrahmanyam, CA (hereinafter in short “Ld.AR”), prayed to take up Ground No. 3 raised in Form No. 36 along with the Additional Ground Nos. 3 & 4 as a preliminary issue, as the Ground No. 3 in Form No. 36 was not raised before both the Authorities below. He seeks leave of this Tribunal to admit and adjudicate Ground No. 3 in the interest of justice.

3. The Learned Departmental Representative, Shri CVA Rama Rao, Sr.AR (hereinafter in short “Ld. DR”) reported no objection.

4.Ld.AR submits that the Ground No. 3 raised by the assessee challenging the penalty initiated by the A.O under section 271D of Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) and consequentially penalty imposed thereon is without jurisdiction and not legally valid in the eyes of law. He refers to the A.O order dated 06.09.2018 and submits that the A.O recorded only initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top