2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 10784
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
CLAREMONT CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3() MUMBAI – Respondent
ITA 1785/MUM/2026[2021-22]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH “H(SMC)”, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND
SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.1785/Mum/2026
(Assessment year: 2021-22)
Claremont Co Operative vs ITO, Ward 3(1), Mumbai
Housing Society Ltd. Ashar I.T. Park, 6th floor, Road
Claremont CHS Ltd. Eastern No.16Z, Brodma, Neheru Nagar,
Express Highway, Lodha Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane
Luxuria Near Lodha Paradise West-400604
Majiwada Thane West-400601
PAN:AADAC5131A
APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Ms. Neha Paranjpe
Revenue by : Shri Pravin Salunkhe (Sr. DR)
Date of hearing : 16/04/2026
Date of pronouncement : 22/04/2026
O R D E R
Per: Anikesh Banerjee (JM):
The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal) ADDL/JCIT-A 2 Visakhapatnam [for brevity
the “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for
brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2021-22, date of order 25.08.2025. The
impugned order emanated from the order of the Assessment Unit Income Tax
##PAGE2##2
ITA No.1785/Mum/2026
Claremont co Operative Housing Society Ltd.
Department, CPC Bengaluru (for brevity the ‘Ld. AO’) order passed under section
143(1) of the Act date of order 14.11.2022.
2. The registry informed that the appeal was filed with a delay for 112 days
delay. The Chairman of the assessee-trust, Mr. Tejwant Navalkar executed a
notarized affidavit on 19.02.2026 and explained the delay for filing the same. The
Ld. DR had not made any strong objection against the submission of the assessee.
Accordingly, we find that there is a sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal
for 112 days. Accordingly, we condone the delay for filing the appeal before us
and the appeal is taken for adjudication.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the assessee is a Cooperative Housing
Society and filed the return by claiming deduction u/sec. 80P(2)(d) for the interest
received on fix deposit with Cooperative banks. The Ld. AO has disallowed the
claim of the assessee. The assessee has invested its surplus funds in terms of
deposit with “Saraswat Cooperative Bank” and “Thane District Central
Cooperative Bank”. The gross total income was Rs.17,41,092/- after claiming
deduction u/sec. 80P(2)(d) amount to Rs.7,83,714/- the taxable income is
calculated amount to Rs.9,57,380/- on which the total income tax with interest
was incurred amount to Rs.3,45,510/- and was paid during the filing of return of
income. The Ld. AO disallowed the claim u/sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act as the
Cooperative Bank is not eligible u/sec. 80P(4). The aggrieved assessee filed an
appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before us.
##PAGE3##3
ITA No.1785/Mum/2026
Claremont co Operative Housing Society Ltd.
4. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on
record. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee filed the return of income
declaring a total income after claiming deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Act.
The case was selected for scrutiny. The assessee had claimed deduction under
section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income amounting to Rs.
7,83,714/-.The Ld. AO observed that the assessee had earned total interest
income of Rs. 7,83,714/- from investments in the cooperative banks named
“Saraswat Cooperative Bank” and “Thane District Central Cooperative Bank”.
5. The Ld. DR, during the course of hearing, contended that the assessee is
not entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(d) in respect of the amount
of Rs. 7,83,714/- for contravening provision u/sec 80P(4) of the Act. The Ld. DR
strongly relied upon the orders of the lower authorities.
6. The only issue as agitated by the assessee society related to interest and
dividend from co-operative banks which is claimed as deduction under section
80P(2)(d) of the Act. Ld. AR contended that the Ld. CIT(A) cited various judicial
precedents but the inference drawn in the instan