SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 10908

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
CARE STOCK BROKING SERVICES AHMEDABAD – Appellant
Versus
THE ITO WARD-1(3)(1) AHMEDABAD – Respondent


ORDER

PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:-

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the CIT(A)”] under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2016–17.

2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“I. Violation of Principle of natural justice and equity.

1. The learned CIT(A) has grievously erred in law and on facts in not adjudicating the ground raised by the appellant firm for violation of the cardinal principles of natural justice and equity on part of the AO by not providing another opportunity of personal hearing through video conferencing after the same could not be held due to technical glitches. Thus, the AO having not followed the fundamental aspect of the assessment process, ensuring a fair and reasoned conclusion contrary to the provisions of Section 144B(9) of the Act, the learned CIT(A) ought to have quashed the impugned order as held by various courts of law including the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court.

2. The learned CIT(A) further erred in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top