SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 10966

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (HYDERABAD BENCH)
KRISHNA MURTHY PAIVARDAN WARANGAL – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD-1 WARANGAL – Respondent


Krishna Murthy Paivardan

BHEEMARAM (V)

Hasanparthy (M)

Warangal Dist.

PAN BITPP1288F

vs. The Income Tax Officer,

Ward-1,

WARANGAL.

(Appellant) (Respondent)
िनधारती ारा/Assessee by : Sri A Vamseedhar, CA
राज व ारा/Revenue by : Sri Ashutosh Pradhan, Sr. AR

सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 21.04.2026

घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 30.04.2026

आदेश/ORDER

PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT :

This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 24.10.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment year 2015-2016.

The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

1. “That the learned Assessing Officer ("Ld. AO") erred in law and on facts in initiating proceedings under section 148A(b) and issuing notice under section 148 dated 25.04.2022 without fulfilling the mandatory jurisdictional conditions prescribed under sections 147, 148, 148A and 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ["Ld. CIT(A)"] erred in deciding to set-aside such reassessment, which is void ab initio and liable to be quashed.

2. That the reassessment proceedings for A.Y. 2015-16 were initiated beyond t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top