SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 11468

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (INT TAX) - 3(2)(1) MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
MFE FORMWORK TECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD MUMBAI – Respondent


आदेश/ORDER 

PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.M.] :-

The present appeal emanating from the appellate order dated 17.11.2025 is preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeal, CIT(A)-57, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to assessment order passed u/s. 143(3)r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] dated 25.05.2024 for the Assessment Year [A.Y.] 2022-23.

2. The grounds of appeal are as under:-

1. “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that once the AE is remunerated at ALP, the assessment cannot be prejudicial to interest of revenue, when the assessee itself has adopted a dual taxpayer approach and attributed profits to its PE in India?”

2. “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating that once assessee has adopted dual taxpayer approach and has PE in India, the profits attributable to it have to be calculated on ALP basis as per the Article 7 of DTAA irrespective of the ALP compensation made to AE in India?”

3. “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top