INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
PANKAJ JAYANTILAL PATEL MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
DY CIT CIRCLE -32(1) MUMBAI – Respondent
ITA 8973/MUM/2025[2011-12]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH “C”, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.8973/Mum/2025
(Assessment year: 2011-12)
Pankaj Jayantilal Patel vs DCIT Circle-32(1), Mumbai
6th& 7th Floor, Divya Darshan Room No.702, Kautilya Bhavan, G
Vallabhnagar CHS, JVPD Block, Bandra Kurla Complex,
Scheme, N S Road No.5, Vile Bandra (E), Mumbai-400051
Parle (W), Mumbai-400056
PAN:AABPP2157L
APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri Kumar Kale
Revenue by : Shri R.A. Dhyani CIT DR & Shri V.S. Mahajan (Sr.DR)
Date of hearing : 04/05/2026
Date of pronouncement : 06/05/2026
O R D E R
Per:Anikesh Banerjee (JM):
The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the NFAC, Delhi
[for brevity the “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax
Act 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2011-12, date of order
30.10.2025. The impugned order emanated from the order of the Ld. Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax Officer-21(1), Mumbai (for brevity the ‘Ld. AO’)
order passed under section 143(3) of the Act date of order 31.03.2014.
##PAGE2##2
ITA No.8973/Mum/2025
Pankaj Jayantilal Patel
2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual capacity
filed the return by declaring total income Rs.1,69,18,240/-, comprising mainly of
business income amount to Rs.1,42,94,623/- in respect of Trading and F&O
activities in share and interest and short term capital gain of Rs.1,82,672/- on sale
of shares. The assessee also declares long term capital gain amount to
Rs.1,79,818/-. The assessee also reported long term capital gain Rs.10,20,97,931/-
on sale of shares which was claimed exempt u/sec. 10(38) of the Act. In the return
of Income, the assessee disallowed the expenses related to dividend income
under the head “expenses related to dividend” amount to Rs.18,44,964/- which
was claimed that the said expenses are disallowed related to dividend income in
nature of disallowance of Section 14A of the Act. During the assessment
proceeding the Ld. AO had separately calculated the expenses related exempted
income u/sec. 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 and
determined 0.5% of average investment of Rs.37,33,18,980/- which comes to
Rs.18,66,595/-. The aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). the
Ld. CIT(A) uphold the impugned assessment order. Being aggrieved assessee filed
an appeal before us.
3. The Ld. AR submitted a paper book comprising pages 1 to 92, which has
been placed on record. The Ld. AR contended that, in the computation of income,
the assessee had already disallowed expenditure relatable to dividend income
amounting to Rs. 18,44,964/-, and the relevant computation is annexed at APB
pages 2 to 5. Accordingly, it was argued that any further disallowance of
expenditure under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D by the Ld. AO would result in double
disallowance. The Ld. AR further submitted that the identical issue has already
been adjudicated by the Coordinate Bench of the ITAT in the assessee’s own case
##PAGE3##3
ITA No.8973/Mum/2025
Pankaj Jayantilal Patel
in ITA No. 6006/Mum/2012, order dated 28.03.2014, and the relevant extract
from paragraph 6 is reproduced here in below:
“6. After considering the entire material placed on record we are of the considered view that
disallowance under Section 14A can be made only if the assessee has incurred expenditure
against the exempt Income. If no expenditure has been claimed, no disallowance can be made
even as per Rule BD. In the instant case we found that total expenditure debited by the assessee
in the P&L account is Rs. 16,28,355/- As per the working given by the assessee before Bench the
assessee himself has made disallowance of 15% of expenditure in respect of depreciation, car
expenses, interest on car loan and car insurance. Thus, 15% of expenditure works out to be
Rs.2,20,575/- As per the assessee there is actual claim of expenditure of Rs 14,07,780/- However
as per the audited P&L account placed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.