SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 11972

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
AMIT GAJANAN KHEDEKAR MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 22.1.6 PIRAMAL CHAMBERS MUMBAI – Respondent


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H(SMC)”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment year: 2018-19)

Amit Gajanan Khedekar vs ITO, Ward 22(1)(6), Mumbai

211, 2nd Floor, Siddhi Sadan, 1st floor, Piramal Chambers, fitwala Road, Elphistone Road, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai-400012 Mumbai-400013 PAN:BQHPK5514P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Nishit Gandhi (virtually appear)

Revenue by : Shri Pravin Salunkhe, (Sr.DR)

Date of hearing : 22/04/2026 Date of pronouncement : 28/04/2026 O R D E R Per:Anikesh Banerjee (JM):

The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [for brevity the “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2018-19, date of order 20.02.2025. The impugned order emanated by the order of the National e- Assessment Centre (for brevity the ‘Ld. AO’) order passed under section 143(3)

r.w.s. 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Act date of order 15.03.2021.

2. The registry informed that the assessee filed the appeal with a delay of 280 days. The assessee filed a notarized affidavit duly executed on 27.03.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top