INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
VASHI INFOTECH PARK PRIMISES CO OP SOCIETY LTD MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD 28(3)(1) MUMBAI – Respondent
ITA 307/MUM/2026[2018-19]
##PAGE1##
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCH “H(SMC)”, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND
SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.307/Mum/2026 (Assessment year: 2018-19)
ITA No.308/Mum/2026 (Assessment year: 2020-21)
Vashi Infotech Park Primises vs ITO, Ward 28(3)(1), Mumbai
Co OP Society Ltd. 3rd Floor, Vashi Income Tax Office-
Plot No.16, Sector 30A, Behind 400703
Raghuleela Mall Vashi Navi
Mumbai-400703
PAN:AABAV0843J
APPELLANT RESPONDENT
Assessee by : Shri R.K. Jadeja
Revenue by : Shri Pravin Salunkhe (Sr. DR)
Date of hearing : 22/04/2026
Date of pronouncement : 28/04/2026
O R D E R
Per: Anikesh Banerjee (JM):
The instant appeal pertains to the assessee filed against the order of the
NFAC, Delhi [for brevity the “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under section 250 of the
Income Tax Act 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2018-19 and
2020-21, date of both orders 19.11.2025. The impugned orders emanated from
the order of the National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi (for brevity the ‘Ld. AO’)
##PAGE2##2
ITA No.307 & 308/Mum/2026
Vashi infotech Park Premises Co Op Society ltd.
order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act date of order 05.03.2021
and 07.09.2022 for A.Y. 2018-19 and A.Y. 2020-21 respectively.
2. Both the appeals pertain to the same assessee and arising out from the
common fact. For convenience both the appeals have taken together and heard
together and disposed of by a common order. ITA 308/Mum/2026, AY 2020-21 is
taken as lead case and the decision rendered therein should be applicable mutatis
mutandis to the other appeals.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the assessee is a cooperative Housing
Society and filed its return by declaring income nil. After the due deduction u/sec.
80P amount to Rs.44,70,687/-. Subsequently the case was selected for scrutiny
through CASS under complete category. After due verification the Ld. CIT(A) has
rejected the claim of deduction under Chapter VI-A, u/sec. 80P of the Act and
added back with the total income. The aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before
the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) uphold the impugned assessment order. Being
aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before us.
4. The Ld. AR contended that it is a well-settled proposition of law that any
surplus arising from mutual dealings between a society and its members is not
taxable, by virtue of the doctrine of mutuality. Although such surplus, including
members’ subscriptions, may partake the character of income or profits, the same
is not exigible to tax owing to the mutual nature of the transactions. Even interest
charged by the society on outstanding dues of its members constitutes a
contribution from members and satisfies the test of mutuality, since the
contributors and the participators are identical. The essence of the principle of
##PAGE3##3
ITA No.307 & 308/Mum/2026
Vashi infotech Park Premises Co Op Society ltd.
mutuality lies in the complete identity between the contributors to the common
fund and the participants in the surplus, who are also its beneficiaries. In simple
terms, a person cannot make a profit out of himself; therefore, any amount
received from oneself cannot be regarded as income liable to tax. Consequently,
income falling within the ambit of the doctrine of mutuality is not chargeable to
tax. In the present case, the surplus has arisen solely out of mutual dealings
between the society and its members. The doctrine of mutuality squarely applies,
as all contributors to the common fund are entitled to participate in the surplus,
and all participators are contributors thereto. There exists a complete identity
between contributors and participators, thereby attracting the principle of
mutuality. Accordingly, the surplus of Rs.44,70,687/- cannot be treated as taxable
income in the hands of the society. Respectful reliance is also placed on the
judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ITO v. Venkatesh Premises Co-
operative Society Ltd. reported in [2018] 91 taxmann.com 137 (SC) Non-
occupancy charges rec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.