INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
ITO THANE – Appellant
Versus
HANSU KUMAR PANDEY BHAYANDER – Respondent
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BENCH: SMC BEFORE HON’BLE BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER िनधा(cid:5)रण वष(cid:5)/Assmt. Year: 2009-10)
Permanent Account Number: AAEPP7085Q HANSU KUMAR PANDEY
35, SHIV SHANKER ITO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, ASHAR IT PARK, THANE- Vs. BP ROAD BHAYNDER-
400604, MAHARASHTRA 401105 THANE-401105, MAHARASHTRA (अपीलाथ(cid:15) Appellant) ((cid:16)(cid:17)थ(cid:15) Respondent)
िनधा(cid:5)(cid:6)रती (cid:10)ारा/Assessee Shri Pramod Kumar Parida represented by:
राज(cid:12) व (cid:10)ारा/Revenue Shri Sandeep Jumale-Sr. DR represented by:
सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of
29-Apr-2026 hearing:
घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 30/04/2026 आदेश / ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal is filed by the Department against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl/JCIT (A)-1 Gurugram, [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 16/12/2025 for the Assessment Year 2009-10, on the following grounds of appeal:
“1) a. On the facts and in circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in restricting the disallowance of purchases to 12.5% of total bogus purchases of R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.