vk;djvihyh; vf/kdj.k] t;iqjU;k;ihB] t;iqj IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’’SMC” JAIPUR Mk

0 ,l- lhrky{eh]U;kf;dlnL; ,oJa hjkBksMdeys'kt;UrHkkb]Z ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihyl-a@ITA No.1351/JP/2024 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@AssessmentYear : 2015-16 Shri Vimal Kumar Garg cuke The ITO

33, Bandhu Nagar, Murlipura Vs. Ward 4(3)

Jaipur – 302 012 Jaipur LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj l-a@PAN/GIR No.: AEGPG 3109 Q vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Rajesh Kumar Kabra, CA jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, Addl.CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing : 12/03/2025 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: : 17/03/2025 vkns'k@ORDER PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 26-07-2022, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ hereinafter referred to as (NFAC) ] for the assessment year 2015-16 raising the grounds appeal as mentioned at Form 36.

2.1 During the course of hearing, the Bench noticed that there is delay of 776 days in filing the appeal for which the assessee vide a