SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 13567

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (BANGALORE BENCH)
Prashant Maharishi, Vice-President, Keshav Dubey, Judicial Member
Rashtrotthana Sahitya and Mudrana Trust – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
ITA No. 2146/Bang/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Prakash Hegde
For the Respondents: Subramanain

The activity of printing and publishing books for educational purposes, including literature on culture and values, qualifies as 'education' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rather than 'general public utility', and remains eligible for tax exemption even if the entity generates a surplus from its activities.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 11, 12, 12AA, 143(3) - Charitable Trust - Exemption - Educational activity vs. General public utility - Printing and publication of books - Assessee trust engaged in publication of books of educative value - Revenue denied exemption u/s 11 and 12, treating it as trade/commerce under proviso to s. 2(15) - Tribunal observed that the activity of producing books for life-values, history, and education, even if sold for consideration, qualifies as 'education' and not 'advancement of any other object of public utility' - Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by expanding limited scrutiny scope - Principle of consistency applies where Revenue allowed exemptions in prior and subsequent years on identical facts. (Paras 1, 3, 5, 13, 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
Assessee, a charitable trust registered u/s 12AA, carries out printing and publication of educational literature. Scrutiny was initiated on the limited issue of accumulation of surplus u/s 11(2). The AO denied exemption u/s 11 and 12, invoking the proviso to s. 2(15) of the Act, claiming the trust was engaged in commercial trade/business of printing and publishing, rendering the activity one of general public utility rather than education. The CIT(A) upheld this, noting surplus funds were not clearly applied for charitable objects.

Findings of Court:
Establishment of the trust's objects and its control confirms its educational nature. Production of educative materials and books contributes to development of mind and character. The tribunal followed established precedent holding such activity as 'education' and rejected the applicability of the s. 2(15) proviso.

Issues: Whether the printing and publication of books qualifies as an 'educational' activity exempt from income tax or as a commercial activity falling under 'general public utility', and whether the Assessing Officer exceeded the scope of limited scrutiny.

Ratio Decidendi: Activity connected to the training and development of knowledge, skill, mind, and character constitutes 'education' under s. 2(15). Selling books at a price does not strip an entity of its educational character provided the surplus is ploughed back into charitable/educational objectives. Consistency in tax administration requires the Revenue to maintain a similar stance across assessment years on identical facts.

Result: Appeal of the Assessee is allowed.

Table of Content
1. assessment under limited scrutiny restricted to specified issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. requirement of consistency in tax proceedings across assessment years. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. defining educational activity to include printing and selling of books. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. direction to grant tax exemption to the charitable trust. (Para 16 , 17)

ORDER

PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT

1. ITA No. 2146/Bang/2025 is filed by M/s. Rashtrotthana Sahitya and Mudrana Trust (the Assessee/Appellant) against the Appellate Order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (the Ld.CIT(A)) dated 17.07.2025 wherein the Appeal filed by the Assessee against the Assessment Order dated 23.03.2021 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) of the National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi (the Ld. Assessing Officer) was dismissed. The Assessee is aggrieved with the same and is in appeal before us. The only dispute in this case is denial of exemption u/s. 11 and 12 of the Act to the Assessee Trust.

2. Brief facts of the case shows that Assessee Trust filed its return of income on 09.10.2018 disclosing NIL income after claiming deduction u/s. 11. The case of the Assessee was selected for scrutiny on limited issue that the Assessee has accumulated substantial surplus u/s. 11(2) vis-a-vis gross receipts. The notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act was issued. The Assessee is already granted registration u/s. 12AA, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Karnataka on 08.07.1987.

3. The object of the Assessee as per trust deed was printing and publication of books of educative value for the benefit of people and rendering educational activities. The Ld. Assessing Officer was of the view that the printing and publication of books, the Assessee was having total receipt of Rs. 8,40,28,752/- and has arisen surplus of Rs. 1,49,15,806/-. Thus, according to the Ld. Assessing officer, the activity carried out is falling in the category of “advancement of the object of general public utility”.Therefore, the notice was issued to the Assessee to show cause as to why the exemption claimed by the Assessee u/s. 11 of the Act should not be disallowed. The main reason for issue of show cause notice was that the receipts of the Assessee of printing and publication of books is required to be taxed as per the provisions of section 13(8) of the Act.

4. The Assessee submitted that for Assessment Year 2003-04, the coordinate bench in ITA No. 48/Bang/2006 dated 31.01.2017 has decided this issue in favour of the Assessee and allowed the claim of the Assessee in the status of charitable trust. It was stated that the services of printing activity are rendered to the public, it is an educational activity and therefore the exemption cannot be denied.

5. The Ld. Assessing Officer held that the trust whose charitable purpose is an object of general public utility has ventured in the nature of trade and commerce and has also received a fee as a consideration for the services rendered which is in excess of 20% of the gross receipts, proviso to section 2(15) of the Act gets invoked. Accordingly, he held the Assessee Trust is not eligible for exemption u/s. 11 and 12. Accordingly, he found that surplus of Rs. 1,49,15,806/- is chargeable to tax as business income. Assessment Order was passed on 23.03.2021.

6. Assessee preferred Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein Assessee submitted the same facts which Assessee submitted before the Ld. Assessing Officer. The Ld. CIT(A) held that the trust is solely engaged in the business of printing and publication of books and magazines, for which consideration was received. There is no record of funds being spent on education or other objects. The computation sheet annexed to the Assessment Order shows that no amount was applied for charitable purpose under the revenue or capital account. Therefore, there was no valid claim u/s. 11(2) for accumulation nor w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top