SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 14312

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH)
RAJ KUMAR GARG HUF BHIWANI – Appellant
Versus
ITO WARD-1 BHIWANI BHIWANI – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) [in short ‘CIT(A)’] dated 8.1.2026, for assessment year 2015-16.

2. Shri Depam Jain, appearing on behalf of assessee submitted that the assessee is assailing validity of the assessment order on the ground of jurisdiction. Narrating facts of the case, he submitted that notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued on 07.04.2021 for reopening of assessment for AY 2015-16. As per reasons for re-opening total quantum of income that had allegedly escaped assessment is Rs. 42,40,481/-. The ld. Counsel submitted that as per CBDT Instructions No. 01/2022 dated 11.5.2022, no notice u/s. 148 could been issued for AY 2015-16 where the income escaping assessment is less than Rs. 50 lacs. To buttress his arguments, he placed reliance on the decisions of the Tribunal in the case of Rajeev Garg vs. CIT(A) in ITA No. 7804/Del/2025 (AY 2014-15) dated 16.2.2026 and Asseem Sehgal vs. ITO in ITA no. 154 to 156/Del/2205 dated 30.7.2025

3. Per contra, Shri Manoj Kumar representing department vehemently supported the assessment order and the order of the CIT(A) and prayed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top