INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHENNAI BENCH)
SIVARAM LAKSHMI CHENNAI – Appellant
Versus
ITO NCW-19(4) CHENNAI – Respondent
आदेश / O R D E R
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M:
This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 13.02.2026 for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.
2. The assessee is an individual and did not file the return of income for the AY 2015-16. The A.O received information that the assessee is having substantial financial transactions in her bank account. Consequently, the A.O issued a notice u/s. 148(b) of the Act on 20.03.2022. The A.O subsequently passed an order u/s. 148A(d) of the Act and issued a notice u/s. 148 of the Act reopening the assessment on 04.04.2022. The A.O called on the assessee to furnish various details and completed the assessment assessing the income at Rs.24,27,367/-. On further appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the addition/disallowances made by the A.O.
3. The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee submitted that if the legal contentions raised with regard to the notice u/s.148 of the Act being barred by limitation (ground No.5) is considered and adjudicated in favour of the assessee then
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.