SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 14831

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (MUMBAI BENCH)
ACIT MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD MUMBAI – Respondent


आदेश / O R D E R

PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M):

The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 22.07.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, arising out of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 92CA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14.

2. The Revenue is principally aggrieved by the action of the learned CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of prior period expenditure amounting to Rs.96,23,13,622/-. According to the Revenue, the assessee had failed to establish that the liabilities corresponding to such expenditure had crystallised during the year under consideration and therefore the expenditure relating to earlier periods could not be allowed as deduction in the present assessment year. The Revenue has further contended that the learned CIT(A) erred in granting relief by following the order of the Tribunal rendered in assessee’s own case for Assessment Year 2012-13 without independently appreciating the facts and evidences pertaining to the year under consideration.

3. Briefly stated, the facts borne out from the record are that the asses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top