INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CHANDIGARH BENCH)
RAJ KUMAR KURUKSHETRA – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-3 KURUKSHETRA KURUKHERTRA – Respondent
ITA 234/CHANDI/2026[2020-21]
##PAGE1##
1
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
PHYSICAL HEARING
HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
1. आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.234/CHANDI/2026
(िनधा(cid:330)रणवष(cid:330) / Assessment Year: 2020-21)
&
2. आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.235/CHANDI/2026
(िनधा(cid:330)रण वष(cid:330) / Assessment Year: 2020-21)
Shri Raj Kumar ITO Ward – 3
C/o Rajiv Goel and Associates Kurukshetra
बनाम/ Vs.
179, Bank Road, Ambala Cantt.
Haryana – 133001
(cid:725)ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AQFPK-0368-L
(अपीलाथ५/Appellant) : (ঋ(cid:529)थ५ / Respondent)
अपीलाथ५कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Rohit Goel (CA) – Ld. AR
ঋ(cid:529)थ५कीओरसे/Respondent by : Dr. Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR
सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 16-07-2026
घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 23-07-2026
:
आदेश / O R D E R
1. Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-
21 assail quantum assessment as well as levy of penalty u/s
272A(1)(d). The Ld. AR, at the outset, sought remand back of
quantum appeal to lower authorities on the ground that the assessee
could not represent therein. The same has been opposed by Ld. Sr.
DR. The Ld. AR stated that the assessee is in a position to
substantiate its case.
##PAGE2##2
2. In the assessment order, Ld. AO made various additions to
determine total income at Rs.16.42 Lacs for want of substantive
representation from the assessee. The Ld. AO also levied penalty of
Rs.20,000/- u/s 272A(1)(d) for assessee’s failure to respond to
hearing notices. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the assessment as well as
the penalty for the same very reasons. Aggrieved, the assessee is in
further appeals before Tribunal. It is the submission of Ld. AR that the
assessee has received retirement benefits and accordingly, the
assessee is in a position to substantiate its case before lower
authorities. It has further been stated that non-appearance was not
willful.
3. Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice and considering
the background of the assessee, I delete impugned penalty as levied
u/s 272A(1)(d). The quantum assessment is set aside and the matter
is restored back to Ld. AO for de novo assessment with a direction to
the assessee to plead and prove its cases forthwith.
3. ITA No.235/Chandi/2026 stand allowed. ITA No.234/Chandi/2026
stand allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 23rd July, 2026.
-Sd-
(MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AS
Dated: 23/07/2026
##PAGE3##3
आदेश की (cid:366)ितिलिप अ(cid:356)ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथ५/Appellant
2. ঋ(cid:529)थ५/Respondent
3. आयकरआयुঢ/CIT
4. िवभागीयঋितिनिध/DR
5. गाड१फाईल/GF
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT CHANDIGARH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.