IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(T) No. 556 of 2021
M/s Budhia Agencies Private Limited having its
registered office at Main Road, Ranchi represented
through its Director Sri Rahul Budhia R/O Booty More,
Ranchi, Jharkhand
--- --- Petitioner
Versus
1.Union of India
(i) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Dept. of Revenue), New Delhi
(ii) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi
2.The Chief Commissioner of Central Tax, Goods and Service Tax &
Central Excise, Ranchi
3.The Commissioner of Central Tax, Goods and Services Tax &
Central Excise, Ranchi
4.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Tax Dept., Ranchi
5.I.T. Nodal Officer, Grievance Related Committee, State Tax, Ranchi
--- --- Respondents
…....
CORAM: HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioners : M/s N.K. Pasari, Sidhi Jalan, Advocates
For the Respondents : M/s P.A.S Pati, Ranjana Mukherjee, Advocate (for CGST)
: Mr. Laxman Kumar, CGC ( for UOI)
05/17.01.2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The writ petition was preferred with the following prayer:
a) Writ of declaration and / or any other appropriate writ(s) and / or
order(s) and / or direction (s) declaring the provision of sub-Rule (1) of
Rule 117 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 as ultra vires
of Section 140(3) read with Section 164 of the Central Goods and
Service Tax Act, 2017 to the extent it prescribes time and manner for
availment of transitional credit of eligible taxes and duties paid under
the existing laws by the registered person on inputs, inputs contained in
semi finished and finished goods held in stock on the appointed day i.e.
01st July, 2017.
b) Writ of declaration and / or any other appropriate writ(s) and / or
order(s) and /or direction(s) declaring that the retrospective
amendment of sub-Section (3) of Section 140 of the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act, 2017 w.e.f 01-07-2017 by Section 128(c) of Chapter
IV of the Finance Act, 2020 empowering the Central Government to
prescribe by rules the time and manner of availing transitional credit
does not make the impugned sub-Rule (1) of Rule 117 of the Central
Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 framed by the Central
Government by Notification No.3/2017-Central Tax dated 19.06.2017
and / or actions taken thereunder, as valid, in absence of any validation
clause;
c) Writ of declaration and /or any other appropriate writ(s) and /or
order(s) and /or direction(s) declaring sub Rule (1) of Rule 117 of the
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as unconstitutional and
violative of Article 14, Article 19(1)(g), Article 265 and Article 300A of
the Constitution of India;
d) Writ of declaration and /or any other appropriate writ(s) and /or
direction (s) declaring Clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of Section 117 of the
Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 as ultra vires of sub-
Section (3) of Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017 as it existed prior to amendment by Section 128(c) of Chapter IV
-2-
of the Finance Act, 2020;
e) Writ of declaration and / or any other appropriate writ(s) and /or
order(s) and /or direction (s) declaring that the retrospective
amendment of sub-section (3) of Section 140 of the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act, 2017 w.e.f 01-07-2017 by Section 128(c) of Chapter
IV of the Finance Act, 2020 empowering the Central government to
prescribe by rules the time and manner of availing transitional credit
does not make Clause (b) of sub-Rule (2) of Rule 117 of the Central
Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 framed by the Central
Government by Notification No.3/2017-Central Tax dated 19-06-2017
and/or actions taken thereunder as valid in absence of any validation
clause;
f) Writ(s) of declaration and/or any other ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.