SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(JHK) 4018

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
PRADIP KUMAR ROY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND And ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Criminal Revision No.634 of 2009

--------

Pradip Kumar Roy

..… Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Jharkhand

2. Lalita Gupta

….. Opp. Parties

---------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

---------

For the Petitioner

:

Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate

For the Opp. Parties :

Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P.

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate

---------

08/08.02.2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This criminal revision application is directed

against the order dated 11.02.2009 passed by the learned

Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in Criminal Revision No. 305 of

2008, by which learned Sessions Judge set aside the order

dated 23.09.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist

Class, Dhanbad in C.P. Case No. 1320 of 2008, whereby the

learned Magistrate found the prima facie case to be true

under Sections 354/509 I.P.C. and not found the prima facie

case to be true under Section 376/511/452 I.P.C. The

learned Sessions Judge had made observation in the

impugned order to the effect that prima-facie case under

Section 376/5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top