HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
NAIMUN BHAGAT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
A.B.A./8905/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 8905 of 2022
Naimun Bhagat
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
……Opposite party
----------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.
…..
Order No.03/ Dated:25.01.2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Senha P.S. Case No. 64 of
2022 instituted under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 4/54 of Jharkhand Minor Minerals and Concession Rule, 2004 &
Section 7/13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining,
Transportation and Storage) Rule, 2017, the petitioner has moved to this
Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
As per F.I.R., allegation is that the tractor of the petitioner was seized
for illegal transportation of 70 cft. sand.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is
innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely
implicated in this case. It is submitted that petitioner has one criminal
antecedent as mentioned in the case diary, being Senha P.S. Case No. 46
of 2000 in which petitioner has already been acquitted. Petitioner has no
other criminal antecedent. It is submitted that the alleged 70 cft. sand was
loaded on the tractor by the driver of the petitioner without any knowledge
of the petitioner. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-
operate with the investigation of the case and also abide by all terms and
conditions which may be imposed in the matter of granting anticipatory
bail to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner may be extended the privilege
of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of
allegation coupled with materials on record, I am inclined to grant
privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner
is directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today
and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail
on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
S.D.J.M., Lohardaga in connection with Senha P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022
with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the
case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by
him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card
with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the
pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.K/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.